Abundance and dispersion of the invasive Mediterranean annual, Centaurea melitensis in its native and non-native ranges

被引:16
作者
Moroney, Jolene R. [1 ]
Rundel, Philip W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Centaurea melitensis; Comparative biogeography; Plant demography; Invasive species; Mediterranean ecosystems; Plant invasion; PLANT INVASIONS; COMMUNITIES; DISTURBANCE; CONSEQUENCES; BIODIVERSITY; ASTERACEAE; RESOURCES; DIVERSITY; DOMINANCE; GRASSES;
D O I
10.1007/s10530-012-0302-1
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
In general, invasive plants are assumed to behave more aggressively in their invasive ranges than in their native range, and studies of the mechanisms of invasion often assume these differences. However, comparisons of abundances between native and invasive ranges are rarely carried out. We compared density and dispersion of the invasive plant, Centaurea melitensis (Asteraceae) in its native range and two invasive ranges of similar mediterranean-climate type. The objective was to quantify the differences in its abundance among three distant regions. We surveyed six sites in the native range (Spain) and in each of two invaded ranges (California and central Chile) for population density, relative dominance and spatial distribution of Centaurea. Centaurea occurred at higher densities in invasive sites than in native ones, with a median of 100 plants per m(2) and 70 plants per m(2) in California and Chile, respectively, compared to only 4 plants per m(2) in Spain. Centaurea was more dominant in both invasive ranges than in the native range. Centaurea density and relative dominance were highly variable within regions. Plants in Spain were randomly dispersed, while those in both invasive ranges were more aggregated. Annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were the best predictors of Centaurea density. In California sites, density was negatively correlated with soil nutrients. The presence of at least one high-density population with near total dominance in Spain suggests that there might be ecological mechanisms for invasiveness in Centuarea that are not unique to invaded ranges.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 507
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [21] Hendry G.W., 1931, Agricultural History, V5, P110
  • [22] Topsoil properties and seddling recruitment in Lavandula latifolia:: stage-dependence and spatial decoupling of influential parameters
    Herrera, CM
    [J]. OIKOS, 2002, 97 (02) : 260 - 270
  • [23] A biogeographical approach to plant invasions:: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range
    Hierro, JL
    Maron, JL
    Callaway, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2005, 93 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [24] Disturbance facilitates invasion:: The effects are stronger abroad than at home
    Hierro, Jose L.
    Villarreal, Diego
    Eren, Ozkan
    Graham, Jon M.
    Callaway, Ragan M.
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 168 (02) : 144 - 156
  • [25] Hierro JL, 2009, OIKOS, V118, P529, DOI [10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17283.x, 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17283.x]
  • [26] Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
    Hijmans, RJ
    Cameron, SE
    Parra, JL
    Jones, PG
    Jarvis, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (15) : 1965 - 1978
  • [27] DISTURBANCE, DIVERSITY, AND INVASION - IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATIONS
    HOBBS, RJ
    HUENNEKE, LF
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) : 324 - 337
  • [28] Why have European herbs so successfully invaded the Chilean matorral?: Effects of herbivory,soil nutrients, and fire
    Holmgren, M
    Avilés, R
    Sierralta, L
    Segura, AM
    Fuentes, ER
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2000, 44 (02) : 197 - 211
  • [29] EFFECTS OF SOIL RESOURCES ON PLANT INVASION AND COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN CALIFORNIAN SERPENTINE GRASSLAND
    HUENNEKE, LF
    HAMBURG, SP
    KOIDE, R
    MOONEY, HA
    VITOUSEK, PM
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1990, 71 (02) : 478 - 491
  • [30] ECOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF CALIFORNIAS MEDITERRANEAN GRASSES
    JACKSON, LE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1985, 12 (04) : 349 - 361