Quality assurance of HDR prostate plans: Program implementation at a community hospital

被引:1
作者
Rush, JB [1 ]
Thomas, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] High Point Reg Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, High Point, NC 27262 USA
关键词
prostate; brachytherapy; HDR; quality assurance;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2005.08.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate is currently the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, and the second leading cause of cancer mortality. The utilization of radiation therapy is regarded as the definitive local therapy of choice for intermediate- and high-risk disease, in which there is increased risk for extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or regional node involvement. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a logical treatment modality to deliver the boost dose to an external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment to increase local control rates. From a treatment perspective, the utilization of a complicated treatment delivery system, the compressed time frame in which the procedure is performed, and the small number of large dose fractions make the implementation of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program imperative. One aspect of this program is the QA of the HDR treatment plan. Review of regulatory and medical physics professional publications shows that substantial general guidance is available. We provide some insight to the implementation of an HDR prostate plan program at a community hospital. One aspect addressed is the utilization of the low-dose-rate (LDR) planning system and the use of existing ultrasound image sets to familiarize the radiation therapy team with respect to acceptable HDR implant geometries. Additionally, the use of the LDR treatment planning system provided a means to prospectively determine the relationship between the treated isoclose volume and the product of activity and time for the department's planning protocol prior to the first HDR implant. For the first 12 HDR prostate implants, the root-mean-square (RMS) deviation was 3.05% between the predicted product of activity and time vs. the actual plan values. Retrospective re-evaluation of the actual implant data reduced the RMS deviation to 2.36%. (c) 2005 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 248
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Monte Carlo dosimetry of a new 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source [J].
Angelopoulos, A ;
Baras, P ;
Sakelliou, L ;
Karaiskos, P ;
Sandilos, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (11) :2521-2527
[2]  
BEAHRS OH, 1997, AM JOINT COMMITTEE C
[3]   Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: Implications for treatment planning [J].
Beard, CJ ;
Kijewski, P ;
Bussiere, M ;
Gelman, R ;
Gladstone, D ;
Shaffer, K ;
Plunkett, M ;
Costello, P ;
Coleman, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (02) :451-458
[4]   Pd-103 brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for clinically localized, high-risk prostatic carcinoma [J].
Dattoli, M ;
Wallner, K ;
Sorace, R ;
Koval, J ;
Cash, J ;
Acosta, R ;
Brown, C ;
Etheridge, J ;
Binder, M ;
Brunelle, R ;
Kirwan, N ;
Sanchez, S ;
Stein, D ;
Wasserman, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (05) :875-879
[5]   Managing geometric uncertainty in conformal intensity-modulated radiation therapy [J].
Jaffray, DA ;
Yan, D ;
Wong, JW .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1999, 9 (01) :4-19
[6]   Cancer statistics, 2004 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Tiwari, RC ;
Murray, T ;
Ghafoor, A ;
Samuels, A ;
Ward, E ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Thun, MJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2004, 54 (01) :8-29
[7]  
Kaplan Irving D, 2004, Brachytherapy, V3, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.brachy.2003.12.003
[8]   High dose-rate brachytherapy treatment delivery: Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 59 [J].
Kubo, HD ;
Glasgow, GP ;
Pethel, TD ;
Thomadsen, BR ;
Williamson, JF .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (04) :375-403
[9]   Optimizing patient selection for prostate monotherapy [J].
Lee, AK ;
Schultz, D ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Richie, JP ;
D'Amico, AV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (03) :673-677
[10]   Using PSA, biopsy Gleason score, clinical stage, and the percentage of positive biopsies to identify optimal candidates for prostate-only radiation therapy [J].
Lieberfarb, ME ;
Schultz, D ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, B ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Weinstein, M ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP ;
D'Amico, AV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (04) :898-903