Rat models of post-irradiation recovery of spermatogenesis: interstrain differences

被引:23
作者
Abuelhija, M. [1 ]
Weng, C. C. [1 ]
Shetty, G. [1 ]
Meistrich, M. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Expt Radiat Oncologym, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ionizing radiation; rat strains; spermatogenesis; spermatogonia; TESTICULAR STEM-CELLS; X-IRRADIATION; SPERMATOGONIAL DIFFERENTIATION; SEMINIFEROUS EPITHELIUM; GENOME SEQUENCE; MOUSE TESTIS; RADIATION; TESTOSTERONE; SURVIVAL; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1111/j.2047-2927.2012.00034.x
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Recently, we reported large differences between rat strains in spermatogenesis recovery at 10 weeks after 5-Gy irradiation suggesting that there are interstrain as well as interspecies differences in testicular radiation response. To determine whether these interstrain differences in sensitivity might be a result of the particular dose and time-point chosen, we performed dose-response and time-course studies on sensitive Brown-Norway (BN) and more resistant spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Type A spermatogonia were observed in atrophic tubules at 10 weeks after irradiation in all strains indicating that tubular atrophy was caused by a block in their differentiation, but the doses to produce the block ranged from 4.0 Gy in BN to 10 Gy in SD rats. Although the numbers of type A spermatogonial were unaffected at doses below 6 Gy, higher doses reduced their number, indicating that stem cell killing also contributed to the failure of recovery. After 10 weeks, there was no further recovery and even a decline in spermatogonial differentiation in BN rats, but in SHR rats, sperm production returned to control levels by 20 weeks after 5.0 Gy and, after 7.5 Gy, differentiation resumed in 60% of tubules by 30 weeks. Suppression of testosterone and gonadotropins after irradiation restored production of differentiated cells in nearly all tubules in BN rats and in all tubules in SHR rats. Thus, the differences in recovery of spermatogenesis between strains were a result of both quantitative differences in their sensitivities to a radiation-induced, hormone-dependent block of spermatogonial differentiation and qualitative interstrain differences in the progression of post-irradiation recovery. The progression of recovery in SHR rats was similar to the prolonged delays in recovery of human spermatogenesis after cytotoxic agent exposure and thus may be a system for investigating a phenomenon also observed in men.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 215
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   Failure of spermatogenesis to recover despite the presence of a spermatogonia in the irradiated LBNF(1), rat [J].
Kangasniemi, M ;
Huhtaniemi, I ;
Meistrich, ML .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1996, 54 (06) :1200-1208
[22]   Suppression of mouse spermatogenesis by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and antiandrogen: Failure to protect against radiation-induced gonadal damage [J].
Kangasniemi, M ;
Dodge, K ;
Pemberton, AE ;
Huhtaniemi, I ;
Meistrich, ML .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1996, 137 (03) :949-955
[23]   SURVIVAL OF MOUSE TESTICULAR STEM-CELLS AFTER GAMMA-IRRADIATION OR NEUTRON-IRRADIATION [J].
LU, CC ;
MEISTRICH, ML ;
THAMES, HD .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1980, 81 (03) :402-415
[24]   GRADUAL REGENERATION OF MOUSE TESTICULAR STEM-CELLS AFTER EXPOSURE TO IONIZING-RADIATION [J].
MEISTRICH, ML ;
HUNTER, NR ;
SUZUKI, N ;
TROSTLE, PK ;
WITHERS, HR .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1978, 74 (02) :349-362
[25]  
Meistrich ML, 2003, J ANDROL, V24, P135
[26]   REDUCTION IN SPERM LEVELS AFTER TESTICULAR IRRADIATION OF THE MOUSE - A COMPARISON WITH MAN [J].
MEISTRICH, ML ;
SAMUELS, RC .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1985, 102 (01) :138-147
[27]  
Meistrich ML, 1993, METHODS TOXICOLOGY A, V3, P106
[28]  
Meistrich ML., 1990, ADV RADIAT BIOL, P227, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-035414-6.50012-2
[29]  
Paulsen CA, 1973, RLO22252 US DEP EN
[30]   EFFECT OF AN ACUTE EXPOSURE OF RAT TESTES TO GAMMA-RAYS ON GERM-CELLS AND ON SERTOLI AND LEYDIG-CELL FUNCTIONS [J].
PINONLATAILLADE, G ;
VIGUIERMARTINEZ, MC ;
TOUZALIN, AM ;
MAAS, J ;
JEGOU, B .
REPRODUCTION NUTRITION DEVELOPMENT, 1991, 31 (06) :617-629