Allergic reactions during labour analgesia and caesarean section anaesthesia

被引:13
作者
Adriaensens, I. [1 ]
Vercauteren, M. [1 ]
Soetens, F. [2 ]
Janssen, L. [3 ]
Leysen, J. [4 ]
Ebo, D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] AZ Turnhout, Dept Anaesthesia, Turnhout, Belgium
[3] St Dimpna Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Geel, Belgium
[4] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Immunol, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Anaesthesia; Allergy; Anaphylaxis; Labour; Caesarean section; AMNIOTIC-FLUID EMBOLISM; GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCUS; ANAPHYLACTOID REACTION; SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; LATEX ALLERGY; CARDIAC-ARREST; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; MATERNAL ANAPHYLAXIS; VAGINAL EXAMINATION; SEVERE COMPLICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2013.04.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Allergic reactions in the parturient are challenging for the anaesthetist who is dealing with both mother and baby, often in circumstances when there is a need for delivery. While most previous reviews have focused on specific substances in individual cases, this review focuses on allergic reactions during the peripartum period, the differential diagnosis and specific treatment options. Immunoregulation and susceptibility to allergic reactions may change during pregnancy. Compared with non-pregnant patients, in whom neuromuscular.blocking drugs are the most common triggering substances, allergic reactions in parturients mostly occur following contact with latex, injection of antibiotics and uterotonics, and infusion of colloids. With the exception of latex, where patient history may raise suspicion, allergic reactions may occur without prior exposure to triggering agents. Most drugs used for resuscitation of the non-pregnant patient are suitable for the parturient. Some substances, such as H-2-receptor antagonists for aspiration prophylaxis or corticosteroids for prematurity, may have been given before the event. Although fetal outcome is important, the mother is the primary focus of care. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 242
页数:12
相关论文
共 148 条
[11]   IgE-mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: separating fact from perception: a UK perspective [J].
Bhole, M. V. ;
Manson, A. L. ;
Seneviratne, S. L. ;
Misbah, S. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 108 (06) :903-911
[12]   CEFOTETAN-INDUCED ANAPHYLAXIS [J].
BLOOMBERG, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 159 (01) :125-126
[13]   Opioid-induced mast cell activation and vascular responses is not mediated by μ-opioid receptors:: An in vivo microdialysis study in human skin [J].
Blunk, JA ;
Schmelz, M ;
Zeck, S ;
Skov, P ;
Likar, R ;
Koppert, W .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (02) :364-370
[14]   Mallampati class changes during pregnancy, labour, and after delivery: can these be predicted? [J].
Boutonnet, M. ;
Faitot, V. ;
Katz, A. ;
Salomon, L. ;
Keita, H. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (01) :67-70
[15]   A pregnant woman with previous anaphylactic reaction to local anesthetics: A case report [J].
Browne, IM ;
Birnbach, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) :1253-1254
[16]   Immediate allergic cross-reactivity to levobupivacaine and ropivacaine [J].
Calderon, A. L. ;
Diot, N. ;
Benatir, F. ;
Christin, F. ;
Hautin, E. ;
Truc, C. ;
Allaouchiche, B. ;
Boselli, E. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (02) :203-205
[17]   Anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: a case study and review of the literature [J].
Chaudhuri, K. ;
Gonzales, J. ;
Jesurun, C. A. ;
Ambat, M. T. ;
Mandal-Chaudhuri, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 17 (04) :350-357
[18]  
Cho HJ, 2012, J INVEST ALLERG CLIN, V22, P216
[19]  
Choo KJ, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4
[20]   The role of sugammadex in the development and modification of an allergic response to rocuronium: evidence from a cutaneous model [J].
Clarke, R. C. ;
Sadleir, P. H. M. ;
Platt, P. R. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (03) :266-273