Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma

被引:118
作者
Wang, Hsin-Yi [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Hueisch-Jy [3 ]
Chen, Jin-Hua [4 ,5 ]
Chao, Chih-Hao [6 ]
Lu, Yu-Yu [1 ]
Lin, Wan-Yu [1 ,7 ,8 ]
Kao, Chia-Hung [7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Life Sci, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Dept Med Imaging & Radiol Sci, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ, Ctr Biostat, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Grad Inst Biostat, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] Chang Bing Show Chwan Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Chest Med, Changhua, Taiwan
[7] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med Sci, Taichung, Taiwan
[8] China Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[9] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Taichung 404, Taiwan
[10] China Med Univ Hosp, PET Ctr, Taichung 404, Taiwan
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; PET; PET/CT; FDG; meta-analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET; DISTANT METASTASES; FDG-PET; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; MALIGNANCIES; ACCURACY; MASSES;
D O I
10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is useful for restaging renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and detecting metastatic diseases but is less satisfactory for detecting primary disease. We evaluated whether the integration of computed tomography (CT) scans with the PET system could increase the applicability of FDG-PET for RCC. Methods: The MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies published since 2001. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study identified. We then performed a meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET findings as reported in all the selected studies. Results: Fourteen studies were eligible for inclusion. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 62% and 88% respectively, for renal lesions. For detecting extra-renal lesions, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET were 79% and 90%, respectively, based on the scans, and 84% and 91% based on the lesions. The use of a hybrid FDG-PET/CT to detect extra-renal lesions increased the pooled sensitivity and specificity to 91% and 88%, respectively, with good consistency. Conclusions: For RCC, combining the FDG-PET and CT systems is helpful for detecting extra-renal metastasis rather than renal lesions. The hybrid PET/CT system has comparable sensitivity and specificity with PET in detecting extra-renal lesions of RCC. Advances in knowledge: The FDG-PET and PET/CT systems are both useful for detecting extra-renal metastasis in renal cell carcinoma.
引用
收藏
页码:464 / 474
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Efficiency of [18F]FDG PET in characterising renal cancer and detecting distant metastases:: a comparison with CT [J].
Aide, N ;
Cappele, O ;
Bottet, P ;
Bensadoun, H ;
Regeasse, A ;
Comoz, F ;
Sobrio, F ;
Bouvard, G ;
Agostini, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2003, 30 (09) :1236-1245
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Cochrane Methods Working Group of Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests: Recommended methods
[3]  
Bachor R, 1996, UROLOGE A, V35, P146
[4]   Imaging approach to staging of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Bechtold, RE ;
Zagoria, RJ .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 24 (03) :507-&
[5]   Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? [J].
Berlin, JA .
LANCET, 1997, 350 (9072) :185-186
[6]   STATISTICAL-METHODS FOR ASSESSING OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN CLINICAL MEASURES [J].
BRENNAN, P ;
SILMAN, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840) :1491-1494
[7]   Differentiating solitary pulmonary metastases in patients with renal cell carcinomas by 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography -: A preliminary report [J].
Chang, CH ;
Shiau, YC ;
Shen, YY ;
Kao, A ;
Lin, CC ;
Lee, CC .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2003, 71 (03) :306-309
[8]   Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG pet in renal cell carcinoma [J].
De Llano, S. R. Martinez ;
Delgado-Bolton, R. C. ;
Jimenez-Vicioso, A. ;
Perez-Castejon, M. J. ;
Delgado, J. L. Carreras ;
Ramos, E. ;
Rotger, A. ;
Jimenez, F. ;
Alonso, J. C. ;
Bittini, A. ;
Dominguez, P. ;
Almoguera, A. ;
Perez-Vazquez, J. M. .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR, 2007, 26 (01) :19-29
[9]   Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening [J].
Deeks, JJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7305) :157-162
[10]  
Frank IN, 1991, CLIN ONCOLOGY, P283