共 26 条
Respiratory System Mechanics During Low Versus High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Open Abdominal Surgery: A Substudy of PROVHILO Randomized Controlled Trial
被引:33
作者:
D'Antini, Davide
[1
]
Huhle, Robert
[2
]
Herrmann, Jacob
[3
,4
]
Sulemanji, Demet S.
[5
,6
]
Oto, Jun
[5
,6
]
Raimondo, Pasquale
[1
]
Mirabella, Lucia
[1
]
Hemmes, Sabrine N. T.
[7
,8
]
Schultz, Marcus J.
[7
,8
]
Pelosi, Paolo
[9
]
Kaczka, David W.
[3
,4
,10
]
Melo, Marcos Francisco Vidal
[5
,6
]
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
[2
]
Cinnella, Gilda
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Foggia, Italy
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Pulm Engn Grp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Anesthesia, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Anesthesia, Boston, MA USA
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Intens Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Lab Expt Intens Care & Anesthesiol LEICA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ Genoa, Dept Surg Sci & Integrated Diagnost, IRCCS AOU San Martino IST, Genoa, Italy
[10] Univ Iowa, Dept Radiol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
POSTOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS;
TIDAL-VOLUME VENTILATION;
GENERAL-ANESTHESIA;
LUNG INJURY;
REGRESSION-ANALYSIS;
DISTRESS-SYNDROME;
RECRUITMENT;
PREVENTION;
D O I:
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002192
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: In the 2014 PROtective Ventilation using HIgh versus LOw positive end-expiratory pressure (PROVHILO) trial, intraoperative low tidal volume ventilation with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP = 12 cm H2O) and lung recruitment maneuvers did not decrease postoperative pulmonary complications when compared to low PEEP (0-2 cm H2O) approach without recruitment breaths. However, effects of intraoperative PEEP on lung compliance remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that higher PEEP leads to a dominance of intratidal overdistension, whereas lower PEEP results in intratidal recruitment/derecruitment (R/D). To test our hypothesis, we used the volume-dependent elastance index %E-2, a respiratory parameter that allows for noninvasive and radiation-free assessment of dominant overdistension and intratidal R/D. We compared the incidence of intratidal R/D, linear expansion, and overdistension by means of %E-2 in a subset of the PROVHILO cohort. METHODS: In 36 patients from 2 participating centers of the PROVHILO trial, we calculated respiratory system elastance (E), resistance (R), and %E-2, a surrogate parameter for intratidal overdistension (%E-2 > 30%) and R/D (%E-2 < 0%). To test the main hypothesis, we compared the incidence of intratidal overdistension (primary end point) and R/D in higher and lower PEEP groups, as measured by %E-2. RESULTS:E was increased in the lower compared to higher PEEP group (18.6 [16...22] vs 13.4 [11.0...17.0] cm H2O<bold>L</bold>-1; P < .01). %E-2 was reduced in the lower PEEP group compared to higher PEEP (-15.4 [-28.0...6.5] vs 6.2 [-0.8...14.0] %; P < .05). Intratidal R/D was increased in the lower PEEP group (61% vs 22%; P = .037). The incidence of intratidal overdistension did not differ significantly between groups (6%). CONCLUSIONS: During mechanical ventilation with protective tidal volumes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, lung recruitment followed by PEEP of 12 cm H2O decreased the incidence of intratidal R/D and did not worsen overdistension, when compared to PEEP 2 cm H2O.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 149
页数:7
相关论文