Are Principal Background and School Processes Related to Teacher Job Satisfaction? A Multilevel Study Using Schools and Staffing Survey 2003-04

被引:101
作者
Shen, Jianping [1 ]
Leslie, Jeffrey M.
Spybrook, Jessaca K. [1 ]
Ma, Xin [2 ]
机构
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Dept Educ Leadership Res & Technol, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Coll Educ, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
teacher job satisfaction; principal background; school process; hierarchical linear modeling; PROFESSIONAL COMMITMENT; EFFICACY; PERFORMANCE; SENSE; INVOLVEMENT; EMPOWERMENT; ATTRITION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3102/0002831211419949
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Using nationally representative samples for public school teachers and principals, the authors inquired into whether principal background and school processes are related to teacher job satisfaction. Employing hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), the authors were able to control for background characteristics at both the teacher and school levels. They found that 17% of the total variance in teacher job satisfaction is between schools, a statistically significant amount that indicates schools can make a difference in teacher job satisfaction. The authors found that school processes-particularly career and working conditions, staff collegiality, administrative support, and to a lesser extent, positive student behavior and teacher empowerment-are positively associated with teacher job satisfaction. Although two principal background variables-the experience of being a department head or an athletic coach/director-are statistically significant, the authors found the block of school process variables explains far more variance than the block of principal background variables. Based on the findings, the authors discussed issues such as the complexity of the phenomenon of teacher job satisfaction, the role of school process versus principal background, and monetary versus cultural factors.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 230
页数:31
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Alt M., 1999, TEACHERS TEACHING RE
[2]  
Anderson E. M., 1991, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[3]  
Anhorn R., 2008, DELTA KAPPA GAMMA B, V74, P15
[4]  
[Anonymous], ED DIGEST
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The international handbook of school effectiveness research, DOI 10.4324/9780203454404
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HIGH COST TEACH TURN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods
[9]   WHAT MAKES A GOOD PRINCIPAL - HOW TEACHERS ASSESS THE PERFORMANCE OF PRINCIPALS [J].
BALLOU, D ;
PODGURSKY, M .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 1995, 14 (03) :243-252
[10]  
Barnett K., 2000, ANN C AUSTR ASS RES