Selection of Cotton Fabrics Using EDAS Method

被引:15
作者
Mitra, Ashis [1 ]
机构
[1] Visva Bharati Univ, Dept Silpa Sadana, Birbhum, W Bengal, India
关键词
Appraisal-Score; cotton; EDAS; fabric; MCDM; selection;
D O I
10.1080/15440478.2020.1821289
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
In this paper, a relatively new and mathematically potent tool of MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) in the form of EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) approach has been proposed for ranking of thirteen candidate cotton fabrics on the basis of four fabric parameters/attributes namely cover, thickness, areal density, and porosity. The ranking and selection of the candidate fabrics have been done with a view to achieving optimal thermal comfort properties. Sample no. 3 with highest appraisal score of 0.9838 achieves rank 1 (best choice) whereas sample no. 6 with lowest appraisal score of 0.0000 occupies rank 13 (worst choice). The ranking results obtained by the proposed method demonstrates a significant agreement in ranking performance with the earlier methods, which is evidenced by very high rank correlation coefficients (R-s>0.87). Ranking patterns given by four imaginary weight sets also possess very high degree of agreement with rank correlation coefficients higher than 0.90. Moreover, there is no occurrence of rank reversal even when the initial decision-making matrix is changed. Thus, sensitivity analyses based on changing the criteria weights and that through influence of dynamic decision matrices further bolster the stability and robustness of the proposed approach in terms of ranking performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2706 / 2718
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Alam S., 2013, J TEXTILE APPAREL TE, V8, P1, DOI DOI 10.1108/RJTA-08-2021-0108
[2]  
Chaitanya K. Lakshmi, 2019, Strojnicky Casopis - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, V69, P45, DOI 10.2478/scjme-2019-0042
[3]   Cotton Fabric Selection Using a Grey Fuzzy Relational Analysis Approach [J].
Chakraborty S. ;
Chatterjee P. ;
Das P.P. .
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series E, 2019, 100 (01) :21-36
[4]  
Chatterjee P., 2018, ENG T, V66, P187
[5]  
Geraldes M J., 2008, Autex Research Journal, V8, P30, DOI DOI 10.1515/AUT-2008-080106
[6]   Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data [J].
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi ;
Amiri, Maghsoud ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Turskis, Zenonas ;
Antucheviciene, Jurgita .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (03) :1627-1638
[7]   Multi-criteria evaluation of green suppliers using an extended WASPAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets [J].
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, Mehdi ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Amiri, Maghsoud ;
Esmaeili, Ahmad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 :213-229
[8]  
Keshavarz Ghorabaee M, 2016, ECON COMPUT ECON CYB, V50, P25
[9]  
Li Y., 2001, Textile Progress, V31, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/00405160108688951
[10]  
Mitra A., 2014, J TEXTILE ASS