The Changing Face of Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials

被引:18
作者
Craft, Barbara S. [2 ]
Kurzrock, Razelle [2 ]
Lei, Xiudong [3 ]
Herbst, Roy
Lippman, Scott
Fu, Siqing [2 ,4 ]
Karp, Daniel D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Unit 432, Clin & Translat Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Phase Program 1, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
phase 1 cancer clinical trials; cancer drug development; research infrastructure; protocol requirement; NONCYTOTOXIC AGENTS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; ONCOLOGY TRIALS; END-POINTS; DESIGN; INSTITUTE; BENEFITS; RISKS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24171
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Phase 1 studies in cancer have changed in recent years. Now, with the advent of new, less toxic, targeted agents, more patients may be candidates for new drug studies earlier in the course of their disease. It is to the advantage of the members of the oncology community to know more regarding the details and requirements for participation in early-phase clinical trials so they can advocate for their patients and help them decide when such trials may be an appropriate choice. To examine the work intensity of early phase cancer clinical trials, the authors of this report compared the study requirements of phase I and 2 protocols. Five parameters were studied as a surrogate of study complexity-the number of physical examinations, vital sign determinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), nonpharmacokinetic laboratory tests, and pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling-in the first 4 weeks of protocol in 90 studies (49 phase I studies and 41 phase 2 studies). From July 2004 through March 2007, there were 49 phase I trials in the phase 1 Program, 9 phase 2 studies that were conducted by physicians appointed in that program, and 32 phase 2 trials with accessible data in the Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology. In the phase 1 trials versus the phase 2 trials, there were significantly more (P < .05) physical examinations (mean standard error, 3.16 +/- 0.24 vs 2.22 +/- 0.13), vital sign determinations (5.63 +/- 0.61 vs 2.80 +/- 0.26), ECGs (4.36 +/- 1.16 vs 0.80 +/- 0.17), nonpharmacokinetic laboratory tests (18.08 +/- 1.31 vs 10.12 +/- 0.65), and PK sampling (15.14 +/- 1.79 vs 1.02 +/- 0.53). These values also differed significantly (P < .005 for each) when the median values were compared in nonparametric tests. Although both phase 1 and phase 2 trials had substantial study requirements, those for the phase 1 studies were significantly higher. The successful conduct of early-phase clinical trials requires significant research infrastructure. Cancer 2009;115:1592-7. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1597
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Evaluating the financial impact of clinical trials in oncology: Results from a pilot study from the association of American Cancer Institutes/Northwestern University Clinical Trials Costs and Charges Project [J].
Bennett, CL ;
Stinson, TJ ;
Vogel, V ;
Robertson, L ;
Leedy, D ;
O'Brien, P ;
Hobbs, J ;
Sutton, T ;
Ruckdeschel, JC ;
Chirikos, TN ;
Weiner, RS ;
Ramsey, MM ;
Wicha, MS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (15) :2805-2810
[2]   Cancer patient care in clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: What does it cost? [J].
Brown, ML .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (10) :818-819
[3]  
EDLER L, 1990, ONKOLOGIE, V13, P90
[4]   Phase I clinical trial design in cancer drug development [J].
Eisenhauer, EA ;
O'Dwyer, PJ ;
Christian, M ;
Humphrey, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (03) :684-692
[5]  
EZEKIEL EJ, 2003, J CLIN ONCOL, V21, P1
[6]  
FREIREICH EMIL J., 1966, CANCER CHEMOTHERAP REP, V50, P219
[7]   DESIGN OF PHASE-I AND PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CANCER - A STATISTICIANS VIEW [J].
GELLER, NL .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1984, 2 (06) :483-491
[8]   Anticancer agents targeting signaling molecules and cancer cell environment: Challenges for drug development? [J].
Gelmon, KA ;
Eisenhauer, EA ;
Harris, AL ;
Ratain, MJ ;
Workman, P .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (15) :1281-1287
[9]   Incremental treatment costs in National Cancer Institute-sponsored clinical trials [J].
Goldman, DP ;
Berry, SH ;
McCabe, MS ;
Kilgore, ML ;
Potosky, AL ;
Schoenbaum, ML ;
Schonlau, M ;
Weeks, JC ;
Kaplan, R ;
Escarce, JJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (22) :2970-2977
[10]   Measuring the incremental cost of clinical cancer research [J].
Goldman, DP ;
Schoenbaum, ML ;
Potosky, AL ;
Weeks, JC ;
Berry, SH ;
Escarce, JJ ;
Weidmer, BA ;
Kilgore, ML ;
Wagle, N ;
Adams, JL ;
Figlin, RA ;
Lewis, JH ;
Cohen, J ;
Kaplan, R ;
McCabe, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (01) :105-110