The evolution and formation of amicus curiae networks

被引:55
作者
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. [1 ]
Christenson, Dino P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Interest groups; Coalition strategies; Amicus curiae briefs; Longitudinal networks; Exponential random graph model; P-ASTERISK MODELS; EXPONENTIAL FAMILY MODELS; SUPREME-COURT; CENTRALITY; STRENGTH; POLICY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.003
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This paper sheds light on two age-old questions of interest group behavior: how have interest group coalition strategies changed over time and which factors determine whether interest groups work together? Through the creation of a new network measure of interest group coalitions based on cosigner status to United States Supreme Court amicus curiae briefs, we illuminate the central players and overall characteristics of this dynamic network from 1930 to 2009. We present evidence of an increasingly transitive network resembling a host of tightly grouped factions and leadership hub organizations employing mixed coalition strategies. We also model the attribute homophily and structure of the present-day network. We find assortative mixing of interest groups based on industry area, budget, sales and membership. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 96
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
[81]  
Segal Jerey A., 1993, The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited
[82]   Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models as a Method for Social Network Analysis in Communication Research [J].
Shumate, Michelle ;
Palazzolo, Edward T. .
COMMUNICATION METHODS AND MEASURES, 2010, 4 (04) :341-371
[83]   New specifications for exponential random graph models [J].
Snijders, Tom A. B. ;
Pattison, Philippa E. ;
Robins, Garry L. ;
Handcock, Mark S. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY 2006, VOL 36, 2006, 36 :99-153
[84]   Why do interest groups engage the judiciary? Policy wishes and structural needs [J].
Solberg, Rorie Spill ;
Waltenburg, Eric N. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2006, 87 (03) :558-572
[85]   Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry [J].
Stuart, TE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1998, 43 (03) :668-698
[86]  
Sunstein CassR., 2006, Are Judges Political? An Empirical Analysis of the Federal Judiciary
[88]   Exponential random graph (p*) models for affiliation networks [J].
Wang, Peng ;
Sharpe, Ken ;
Robins, Garry L. ;
Pattison, Philippa E. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2009, 31 (01) :12-25
[89]   Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks .1. An introduction to Markov graphs and p [J].
Wasserman, S ;
Pattison, P .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1996, 61 (03) :401-425
[90]  
Whitford AndrewB., 2003, Business and Politics, V5, P45