Metastatic basal cell carcinoma: Prognosis dependent on anatomic site and spread of disease

被引:135
作者
McCusker, Margaret [1 ]
Basset-Seguin, Nicole [2 ]
Dummer, Reinhard [3 ]
Lewis, Karl [4 ]
Schadendorf, Dirk [5 ]
Sekulic, Aleksandar [6 ]
Hou, Jeannie [1 ]
Wang, Lisa [1 ]
Yue, Huibin [1 ]
Hauschild, Axel [7 ]
机构
[1] Genentech Inc, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[2] Univ Paris 07, Hop St Louis, Paris, France
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[5] Univ Hosp Essen, Essen, Germany
[6] Mayo Clin, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[7] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
关键词
Carcinoma; basal cell/secondary; Neoplasm metastasis; Epidemiology; Skin neoplasms/pathology; Treatment outcome; LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS; OF-THE-LITERATURE; PULMONARY METASTASIS; HEPATIC METASTASES; NEVUS SYNDROME; MYELOPHTHISIC ANEMIA; MULTIPLE METASTASES; COMPLETE RESPONSE; LUNG METASTASES; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This review provides a description of the epidemiology and survival outcomes for cases with metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) based on published reports (1981-2011). Methods: A literature search (MEDLINE via PubMed) was conducted for mBCC case reports published in English: 1981-2011. There were 172 cases that met the following criteria: primary BCC located on skin, metastasis confirmed by pathology and metastasis not resulting from direct tumour spread. From these, 100 mBCC cases with explicit information on follow-up time were selected for analysis. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among 100 mBCC cases selected for analysis, including one case with Gorlin syndrome, 50% had regional metastases (RM) and 50% had distant metastases (DM). Cases with DM were younger at mBCC diagnosis (mean age, 58.0 versus 66.3 years for RM; P = 0.0013). Among 93 (of 100) cases with treatment information for metastatic disease, more DM cases received chemotherapy (36.2% versus 6.5% for RM), but more RM cases underwent surgery (87.0% versus 40.4% for DM). Among all 100 cases, median survival after mBCC diagnosis was 54 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 24-72), with shorter survival in DM (24 months; 95% CI, 12-35) versus RM cases (87 months; 95% CI, 63-not evaluable). Conclusion: Cases with RM and DM mBCC may have different clinical courses and outcomes. Based on published reports, DM cases were younger at mBCC diagnosis, with shorter median survival than RM cases. This study provides a historical context for emerging mBCC treatments. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:774 / 783
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Adem K, 2004, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V128, P819
[2]   Giant primary basal cell carcinoma with fatal hepatic metastases [J].
Affleck, A. G. ;
Gore, A. ;
Millard, L. G. ;
Perks, A. G. D. ;
Kulkarni, K. ;
Chan, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2007, 21 (02) :262-263
[3]   Basal cell carcinoma with distant multiple metastases to the vertebral column [J].
Alonso, V. ;
Revert, A. ;
Monteagudo, C. ;
Martin, J. M. ;
Insa, A. ;
Pinazo, I. ;
Ferrer, J. ;
Jorda, E. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) :748-749
[4]   Metastatic basal cell carcinoma from head and neck primary lesions [J].
Andrews, RJ ;
Sercarz, JA ;
Fu, YS ;
Calcaterra, TC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 6 (01) :17-22
[5]   METASTATIC BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA - REVIEW AND REPORT OF A CASE [J].
BAKER, PB ;
BERGGREN, R .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1983, 11 (05) :428-430
[6]  
BARTLEY GB, 1989, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V96, P468
[7]   METASTATIC BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA - RESPONSE TO CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
BASON, MM ;
GRANTKELS, JM ;
GOVIL, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1990, 22 (05) :905-908
[8]  
Beadles CF., 1894, TRANSCRIPTS PATHOL S, V45, P176
[9]  
BECK HI, 1983, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V63, P564
[10]   MULTIPLE BONE METASTASES FROM BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
BEER, RE ;
ALCALAY, J ;
GOLDBERG, LH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1992, 31 (09) :637-638