Evaluation of Bone Remodeling After Simultaneous Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Mandibular Angle Ostectomy in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism

被引:4
|
作者
Choi, Song Jay [1 ]
Sim, You-Song [1 ]
Han, Jeong Joon [2 ,3 ]
Kook, Min-Suk [2 ]
Park, Hong-Ju [2 ]
Oh, Hee-Kyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dent Sci Res Inst, 77 Yongbong Ro, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Hard Tissue Biointerface Res Ctr, Gwangju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SETBACK; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; DISPLACEMENT; RESECTION; PLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.044
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study assessed the postoperative bone remodeling after simultaneous sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and mandibular angle ostectomy using a 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography (CT) data. Materials and Methods: We designed and implemented a retrospective study that included patients who had undergone SSRO with (study group) or without (control group) mandibular angle ostectomy. Using CT data taken immediately after (T1) and 6 months (T2) after surgery, the vertical and horizontal morphologic changes of the mandibular angle were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. In the study group, the volumetric changes of the mandibular angle were assessed, and the bone regeneration rate was calculated. Results: A total of 58 mandibular angles were evaluated (32 in the study group and 26 in the control group). The study group exhibited significantly greater vertical bone regrowth at the middle and posterior regions of the mandibular angle ostectomy line compared with that in the control group (middle, P<.001; posterior, P<.001). Both groups showed significant horizontal bone regrowth at 6 months postoperatively (P<.01). In the study group, the postoperative vertical bone regrowth was significantly associated with the extent of exposed bone below the angle ostectomy line at T1 for all regions (P<.001). The percentage of postoperative regenerated bone volume relative to the volume of bone removed intraoperatively was 41.8%. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that significant bone regrowth could occur after mandibular angle ostectomy with simultaneous SSRO. Therefore, it is necessary to consider bone remodeling patterns in the treatment planning stage for better and more predictable surgical outcomes. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2071.e1 / 2071.e11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low-level laser effect in patients with neurosensory impairment of mandibular nerve after sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Randomized clinical trial, controlled by placebo
    Fuehrer-Valdivia, Alberto
    Noguera-Pantoja, Alfredo
    Ramirez-Lobos, Valeria
    Sole-Ventura, Pedro
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2014, 19 (04): : E327 - E334
  • [42] Secondary Treatment of Mandibular Bone Fracture Using Sagittal Split Osteotomy and Segmentation of the Mandible: A Case Report
    Grab, Pawel Piotr
    Chloupek, Aldona
    Nowocien, Jakub
    Jagielak, Maciej
    Jurkiewicz, Dariusz
    REPORTS, 2023, 6 (02)
  • [43] Changes in mandibular width and frontal-lower facial profile after orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with removal of internal bone interference in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion
    Song, In Jae
    Kang, Min Seong
    Lee, Jung Han
    Bae, Eun Yeong
    Kim, Bok Joo
    Kim, Chul Hoon
    Kim, Jung Han
    MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [44] Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Lingual Nerve Deficits After Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy
    Shawky, Maha
    Mosleh, Mohamed
    Jan, Ahmed M.
    Jadu, Fatima M.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (03) : 561 - 564
  • [45] Occurrence of a 'bad' split and success of initial mandibular healing: a review of 524 sagittal ramus osteotomies in 262 patients
    Posnick, J. C.
    Choi, E.
    Liu, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 45 (10) : 1187 - 1194
  • [46] Radiological evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve displacement after removal of impacted mandibular third molars prior to sagittal split osteotomy
    Bagourd, Thomas
    Varazzani, Andrea
    Dugast, Sophie
    Guyonvarc'h, Pierre
    Corre, Pierre
    Bertin, Helios
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (06)
  • [47] Use of Bone Grafts or Modified Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Technique in Large Mandibular Advancements Reduces the Risk of Persisting Mandibular Inferior Border Defects
    Cifuentes, Julio
    Yanine, Nicolas
    Jerez, Daniel
    Barrera, Ariel
    Agbaje, Jimoh Olubanwo
    Politis, Constantinus
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (01) : 189.e1 - 189.e6
  • [48] Relationship Between Masticatory Muscle Size and Bone Regeneration After Mandibular Angle Osteotomy
    Huang, Yuanliang
    Yang, Liya
    Lin, Yanxian
    Mu, Lin
    Zhao, Minghao
    Ma, Xiaoyang
    Teng, Li
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (08) : 2784 - 2787
  • [49] A three-dimensional comparison of the pharyngeal airway after mandibular distraction osteogenesis and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
    Schneider, Daniel
    Kaemmerer, Peer W.
    Schoen, Gerhard
    Bschorer, Reinhard
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (08) : 1632 - 1637
  • [50] Stability of the maxilla and mandible in patients with dentofacial deformities after multi-segmental Le Fort I osteotomy combined with sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Kasahara, Masaki
    Hasebe, Daichi
    Suda, Daisuke
    Sakuma, Hidenobu
    Saito, Naoaki
    Saito, Daisuke
    Nihara, Jun
    Kobayashi, Tadaharu
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2025, 37 (03) : 475 - 479