Evaluation of Bone Remodeling After Simultaneous Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Mandibular Angle Ostectomy in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism

被引:4
|
作者
Choi, Song Jay [1 ]
Sim, You-Song [1 ]
Han, Jeong Joon [2 ,3 ]
Kook, Min-Suk [2 ]
Park, Hong-Ju [2 ]
Oh, Hee-Kyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dent Sci Res Inst, 77 Yongbong Ro, Gwangju 61186, South Korea
[3] Chonnam Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Hard Tissue Biointerface Res Ctr, Gwangju, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
SETBACK; FIXATION; COMPLICATIONS; DISPLACEMENT; RESECTION; PLATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2020.05.044
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The present study assessed the postoperative bone remodeling after simultaneous sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and mandibular angle ostectomy using a 3-dimensional analysis of computed tomography (CT) data. Materials and Methods: We designed and implemented a retrospective study that included patients who had undergone SSRO with (study group) or without (control group) mandibular angle ostectomy. Using CT data taken immediately after (T1) and 6 months (T2) after surgery, the vertical and horizontal morphologic changes of the mandibular angle were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. In the study group, the volumetric changes of the mandibular angle were assessed, and the bone regeneration rate was calculated. Results: A total of 58 mandibular angles were evaluated (32 in the study group and 26 in the control group). The study group exhibited significantly greater vertical bone regrowth at the middle and posterior regions of the mandibular angle ostectomy line compared with that in the control group (middle, P<.001; posterior, P<.001). Both groups showed significant horizontal bone regrowth at 6 months postoperatively (P<.01). In the study group, the postoperative vertical bone regrowth was significantly associated with the extent of exposed bone below the angle ostectomy line at T1 for all regions (P<.001). The percentage of postoperative regenerated bone volume relative to the volume of bone removed intraoperatively was 41.8%. Conclusions: The present findings suggest that significant bone regrowth could occur after mandibular angle ostectomy with simultaneous SSRO. Therefore, it is necessary to consider bone remodeling patterns in the treatment planning stage for better and more predictable surgical outcomes. (C) 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2071.e1 / 2071.e11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Stress Effects of Mandibular Movements on the Temporomandibular Joint With Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Altay, Hilal Turgut
    Ertem, Sinan Yasin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2025, 36 (01) : 206 - 210
  • [22] Penetration of inferior alveolar nerve canal increased by bicortical fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in mandibular prognathism
    Sinha, S. P.
    Duong, T. D. H.
    Duy, T-D T.
    Ko, E. W-C
    Chen, Y-R
    Huang, C. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 51 (02) : 200 - 205
  • [23] Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery
    Yoo, J. -Y.
    Kwon, Y. -D.
    Suh, J. -H.
    Ko, S. -J.
    Lee, B.
    Lee, J. -W.
    Kim, E. -C.
    Girod, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (08) : 994 - 1000
  • [24] Relationship Between Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal Position at Mandibular Second Molar in Patients With Prognathism and Possible Occurrence of Neurosensory Disturbance After Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
    Yoshioka, Izumi
    Tanaka, Tatsurou
    Khanal, Amit
    Habu, Manabu
    Kito, Shinji
    Kodama, Masaaki
    Oda, Masafumi
    Wakasugi-Sato, Nao
    Matsumoto-Takeda, Shinobu
    Fukai, Yasuhiro
    Tokitsu, Takatoshi
    Tomikawa, Megumi
    Seta, Yuji
    Tominaga, Kazuhiro
    Morimoto, Yasuhiro
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (12) : 3022 - 3027
  • [25] The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Moroi, Akinori
    Yoshizawa, Kunio
    Iguchi, Ran
    Ikawa, Hiroumi
    Kosaka, Akihiko
    Hotta, Asami
    Tsutsui, Takamitsu
    Saida, Yuriko
    Ueki, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (09) : 1743 - 1748
  • [26] Changes in the pharyngeal airway space and hyoid bone position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular asymmetry: A retrospective cephalometric study
    Yoshizaki, Ryosuke
    Achiwa, Motonobu
    Inoue, Hiroki
    Nakayama, Atsushi
    Ito, Yu
    Furuta, Hiroshi
    Oguma, Tetsushi
    Abe, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2023, 35 (05) : 401 - 409
  • [27] Variations in the anatomical dimensions of the mandibular ramus and the presence of third molars: its effect on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy
    Beukes, J.
    Reyneke, J. P.
    Becker, P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2013, 42 (03) : 303 - 307
  • [28] Changes in the position of the condyle after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular retrusion and protrusion: a new condyle: fossa matching concept
    Yin, Q.
    Bi, R.
    Abotaleb, B.
    Jiang, N.
    Li, Y.
    Zhu, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 57 (10) : 1086 - 1091
  • [29] 3D simulation of interosseous interference in sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular asymmetry
    Udayakumar, Santhiya Iswarya Vinothini
    Kim, Dohyoung
    Choi, So-Young
    Kwon, Tae-Geon
    MAXILLOFACIAL PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 45 (01)
  • [30] Radiographic cephalometry analysis of condylar position after bimaxillary osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism
    Mikovic, Nikola D.
    Lazarevic, Milos M.
    Tatic, Zoran
    Krejovic-Trivic, Sanja
    Petrovic, Milan
    Trivic, Aleksander
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2016, 73 (04) : 318 - 325