A feasibility and implementation model of small-scale hydropower development for rural electrification in South Africa: A case study of Kwa Madiba SSHP Plant

被引:2
作者
Bonthuys, Gideon Johannes [1 ]
van Dijk, Marco [1 ]
Bhagwan, Jayant Narsee [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pretoria, Dept Civil Engn, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Water Res Commiss, Private Bag X03, ZA-0031 Gezina, South Africa
关键词
small-scale hydropower; rural electrification; feasibility; Kwa Madiba; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.4314/wsa.v42i4.03
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Large numbers of households and communities will not be connected to the national electricity grid for the foreseeable future due to high cost of transmission and distribution systems to remote communities and the relatively low electricity demand within rural communities. Small-scale hydropower used to play a very important role in the provision of energy to urban and rural areas of South Africa. The national electricity grid, however, expanded and offered cheap, coal-generated electricity and a large number of hydropower systems were decommissioned. In this study, a feasibility and implementation model was developed to assist in designing and financially evaluating small-scale hydropower (SSHP) plants. The implementation model describes steps to be followed in identifying a technically possible and economically feasible opportunity to develop a SSHP site for rural electrification. The development model was used in designing the Kwa Madiba SSHP plant. The Kwa Madiba SSHP plant was economically evaluated on net present value, internal rate of return, levelised cost of energy, financial payback period and cost/benefit ratio. The outcome of this study proved that it is technically possible to provide SSHP installations for rural electrification in South Africa that are more feasible than local or national electricity grid extensions or even alternative energy sources such as diesel generators. It was concluded that the levelised cost of SSHP projects indicates that the cost of SSHP for low energy generation is high compared to levelised cost of coal-fired power generation. However, the remoteness of SSHP for rural electrification increases the cost of infrastructure to connect remote rural communities to the national electricity grid. This provides a low cost/benefit ratio and renders technically implementable SSHP projects for rural electrification feasible on this basis.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 541
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Barta B, 2002, P54126EERE70 DME COW
[2]  
Carrasco F., 2011, INTRO HYDROPOWER
[3]  
CENSUS, 2011, AFR CENS 2011 PORT
[4]  
COLORADO ENERGY OFFICE, 2007, SMALL HYDR HDB E BOO
[5]   The economics of renewable energy expansion in rural Sub-Saharan Africa [J].
Deichmann, Uwe ;
Meisner, Craig ;
Murray, Siobhan ;
Wheeler, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (01) :215-227
[6]  
EPRI, 2012, POW GEN TECHN DAT IN
[7]  
Hall D.G., 2006, DOEID11263 ID NAT LA
[8]   A review of low head hydropower technologies and applications in a South African context [J].
Loots, I. ;
van Dijk, M. ;
Barta, B. ;
van Vuuren, S. J. ;
Bhagwan, J. N. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :1254-1268
[9]  
MULLER J, 1999, S AFRICAN RENEWABLE
[10]   Review of small hydropower technology [J].
Okot, David Kilama .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 26 :515-520