Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013

被引:56
作者
Ehinger, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Malmstrom, Per [1 ,3 ]
Bendahl, Par-Ola [1 ]
Elston, Christopher W. [4 ]
Falck, Anna-Karin [5 ]
Forsare, Carina [1 ]
Grabau, Dorthe [1 ,6 ]
Ryden, Lisa [7 ,8 ]
Stal, Olle [9 ]
Ferno, Marten [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Lund Canc Ctr Medicon Village, Div Oncol & Pathol, Lund, Sweden
[2] Blekinge Cty Hosp, Dept Pathol & Cytol, Karlskrona, Sweden
[3] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Lund, Sweden
[4] Nottingham Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Histopathol, Nottingham, England
[5] Helsingborg Hosp, Dept Surg, Helsingborg, Sweden
[6] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Lund, Sweden
[7] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, Lund Canc Ctr Medicon Village, Div Surg, Lund, Sweden
[8] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Lund, Sweden
[9] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Div Oncol, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
TERM-FOLLOW-UP; PREMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS; TUMOR-CELLS; REPRODUCIBILITY; MARKERS; CARCINOMA; TAMOXIFEN; INDEX; KI67;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2016.1237778
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The St Gallen surrogate definition of the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer consist of five subgroups based on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), and Ki-67. PgR and Ki-67 are used for discriminating between the 'Luminal A-like' and 'Luminal B-like (HER2-negative)' subtypes. Histological grade (G) has prognostic value in breast cancer; however, its relationship to the St Gallen subtypes is not clear. Based on a previous pilot study, we hypothesized that G could be a primary discriminator for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers that were G1 or G3, whereas Ki-67 and PgR could provide additional prognostic information specifically for patients with G2 tumors. To test this hypothesis, a larger patient cohort was examined. Patients and methods: Six hundred seventy-one patients (>= 35 years of age, pT1-2, pN0-1) with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and complete data for PgR, Ki-67, G, lymph node status, tumor size, age, and distant disease-free survival (DDFS; median follow-up 9.2 years) were included. Results: 'Luminal A-like' tumors were mostly G1 or G2 (90%) whereas 'Luminal B-like' tumors were mostly G2 or G3 (87%) and corresponded with good and poor DDFS, respectively. In 'Luminal B-like' tumors that were G1 (n = 23), no metastasis occurred, whereas 14 of 40 'Luminal A-like' tumors that were G3 metastasized. In the G2 subgroup, low PgR and high Ki-67 were associated with an increased risk of distant metastases, hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 (0.95-3.4) and 1.5 (0.80-2.8), respectively. Conclusions: Patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative/G1 breast cancer have a good prognosis, similar to that of 'Luminal A-like', while those with ER-positive/HER2-negative/G3 breast cancer have a worse prognosis, similar to that of 'Luminal B-like', when assessed independently of PgR and Ki-67. Therapy decisions based on Ki-67 and PgR might thus be restricted to the subgroup G2.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   THE NOTTINGHAM-PROGNOSTIC-INDEX APPLIED TO 9,149 PATIENTS FROM THE STUDIES OF THE DANISH-BREAST-CANCER-COOPERATIVE-GROUP (DBCG) [J].
BALSLEV, I ;
AXELSSON, CK ;
ZEDELER, K ;
RASMUSSEN, BB ;
CARSTENSEN, B ;
MOURIDSEN, HT .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 32 (03) :281-290
[2]   PAM50 Breast Cancer Subtyping by RT-qPCR and Concordance with Standard Clinical Molecular Markers [J].
Bastien, Roy R. L. ;
Rodriguez-Lescure, Alvaro ;
Ebbert, Mark T. W. ;
Prat, Aleix ;
Munarriz, Blanca ;
Rowe, Leslie ;
Miller, Patricia ;
Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel ;
Anderson, Daniel ;
Lyons, Bradley ;
Alvarez, Isabel ;
Dowell, Tracy ;
Wall, David ;
Angel Segui, Miguel ;
Barley, Lee ;
Boucher, Kenneth M. ;
Alba, Emilio ;
Pappas, Lisa ;
Davis, Carole A. ;
Aranda, Ignacio ;
Fauron, Christiane ;
Stijleman, Inge J. ;
Palacios, Jose ;
Anton, Antonio ;
Carrasco, Eva ;
Caballero, Rosalia ;
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Astill, Mark ;
Bernard, Philip S. ;
Martin, Miguel .
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2012, 5
[3]  
Boiesen P, 2000, ACTA ONCOL, V39, P41
[4]   Intrinsic breast cancer subtypes defined by estrogen receptor signalling-prognostic relevance of progesterone receptor loss [J].
Braun, Lisa ;
Mietzsch, Friederike ;
Seibold, Petra ;
Schneeweiss, Andreas ;
Schirmacher, Peter ;
Chang-Claude, Jenny ;
Sinn, Hans Peter ;
Aulmann, Sebastian .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 (09) :1161-1171
[5]   Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical assay of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer -: Clinical associations and reasons for discrepancies [J].
Chebil, G ;
Bendahl, PO ;
Idvall, I ;
Fernö, M .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2003, 42 (07) :719-725
[6]  
DALTON LW, 1994, CANCER, V73, P2765, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2765::AID-CNCR2820731119>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-K
[8]   International Web-based consultation on priorities for translational breast cancer research [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Goldhirsch, Aron ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Senn, Hans-Joerg ;
Wood, William ;
Viale, Giuseppe .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (06)
[9]  
Ehinger A, 2014, VIRCHOWS ARCH, V465, pS123
[10]   Impact of a national external quality assessment scheme for breast pathology in the UK [J].
Ellis, IO ;
Coleman, D ;
Wells, C ;
Kodikara, S ;
Paish, EM ;
Moss, S ;
Al-Sam, S ;
Anderson, N ;
Bobrow, L ;
Buley, I ;
Connolly, CE ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Hales, S ;
Hanby, A ;
Humphreys, S ;
Knox, F ;
Lowe, J ;
Macartney, J ;
Nash, R ;
Parham, D ;
Patnick, J ;
Pinder, SE ;
Quinn, CM ;
Robertson, AJ ;
Shrimankar, J ;
Walker, RA ;
Winder, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 59 (02) :138-145