Returns and the bullwhip effect

被引:93
作者
Chatfield, Dean C. [1 ]
Pritchard, Alan M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Dept Informat Technol & Decis Sci, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Coll Business & Publ Adm, Dept Econ, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
关键词
Bullwhip effect; Simulation; Returns; Inventory; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; LEAD TIME; IMPACT; INFORMATION; AMPLIFICATION; VARIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; RETAILERS; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.tre.2012.08.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An almost universal assumption in the bullwhip effect modeling literature is that excess goods may be returned without restriction. We seek to determine if returns impact the level of bullwhip effect observed in a multi-stage supply chain. We build a hybrid agent/discrete-event simulation model of a supply chain and execute it under various conditions of demand variance, lead-time variance, information sharing, and return allowance. We find that permitting returns significantly increases the bullwhip effect. As a result, applying models that assume returns are permitted will systematically overestimate the bullwhip effect for supply chains that restrict returns. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 175
页数:17
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Investigating the impact of demand amplification on freight transport [J].
Potter, Andrew ;
Lalwani, Chandra .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2008, 44 (05) :835-846
[52]   The Unexpected Impact of Information Sharing on US Pharmaceutical Supply Chains [J].
Schwarz, Leroy B. ;
Zhao, Hui .
INTERFACES, 2011, 41 (04) :354-364
[53]  
Silver E., 1998, Inventory management and production planning and scheduling
[54]   Impact of supplier's lead time and forecast demand updating on retailer's order quantity variability in a two-level supply chain [J].
So, KC ;
Zheng, XN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 86 (02) :169-179
[55]   The incremental bullwhip effect of operational deviations in an arborescent supply chain with requirements planning [J].
Sodhi, ManMohan S. ;
Tang, Christopher S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 215 (02) :374-382
[56]   Managing the order pipeline to reduce supply chain volatility [J].
Springer, Mark ;
Kim, Ilhyung .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 203 (02) :380-392
[57]   MODELING MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOR - MISPERCEPTIONS OF FEEDBACK IN A DYNAMIC DECISION-MAKING EXPERIMENT [J].
STERMAN, JD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (03) :321-339
[58]  
Towill D. R., 1992, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, V22, P3, DOI 10.1108/09600039210016995
[59]   SUPPLY CHAIN DYNAMICS [J].
TOWILL, DR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1991, 4 (04) :197-208
[60]   Hidden effects of variable order review intervals in inventory control [J].
Waller, Matthew A. ;
Williams, Brent D. ;
Eroglu, Cuneyt .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (3-4) :244-258