Real-world challenges for multi-agent reinforcement learning in grid-interactive buildings

被引:21
作者
Nweye, Kingsley [1 ]
Liu, Bo [2 ]
Stone, Peter [2 ]
Nagy, Zoltan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Intelligent Environm Lab, 301 E Dean Keeton St Stop,ECJ 4 200, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Comp Sci, 2317 Speedway,GDC 2 302, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Grid-interactive buildings; Benchmarking; Reinforcement learning; DEMAND RESPONSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyai.2022.100202
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Building upon prior research that highlighted the need for standardizing environments for building control research, and inspired by recently introduced challenges for real life reinforcement learning (RL) control, here we propose a non-exhaustive set of nine real world challenges for RL control in grid-interactive buildings (GIBs). We argue that research in this area should be expressed in this framework in addition to providing a standardized environment for repeatability. Advanced controllers such as model predictive control (MPC) and RL control have both advantages and disadvantages that prevent them from being implemented in real world problems. Comparisons between the two are rare, and often biased. By focusing on the challenges, we can investigate the performance of the controllers under a variety of situations and generate a fair comparison. As a demonstration, we implement the offline learning challenge in CityLearn, an OpenAI Gym environment for the easy implementation of RL agents in a demand response setting to reshape the aggregated curve of electricity demand by controlling the energy storage of a diverse set of buildings in a district. We use CityLearn to study the impact of different levels of domain knowledge and complexity of RL algorithms and show that the sequence of operations (SOOs) utilized in a rule based controller (RBC) that provides fixed logs to RL agents during offline training affect the performance of the agents when evaluated on a set of four energy flexibility metrics. Longer offline training from an optimized RBC leads to improved performance in the long run. RL agents that train on the logs from a simplified RBC risk poorer performance as the offline training period increases. We also observe no impact on performance from information sharing amongst agents. We call for a more interdisciplinary effort of the research community to address the real world challenges, and unlock the potential of GIB controllers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-agent reinforcement learning: weighting and partitioning
    Sun, R
    Peterson, T
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 12 (4-5) : 727 - 753
  • [22] Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
    Gronauer, Sven
    Diepold, Klaus
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (02) : 895 - 943
  • [23] Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Based Optimal PV-ESS Control In Grid
    Park, Jaemin
    Kwon, Taehyeon
    Kim, Bongseok
    Hwang, Yujeong
    Sim, Min Kyu
    2023 IEEE IAS GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY AND HYDROGEN TECHNOLOGIES, GLOBCONHT, 2023,
  • [24] Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach for EV charging scheduling in a smart grid
    Park, Keonwoo
    Moon, Ilkyeong
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 328
  • [25] Automatic partitioning for multi-agent reinforcement learning
    Sun, R
    Peterson, T
    ICONIP'98: THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING JOINTLY WITH JNNS'98: THE 1998 ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE JAPANESE NEURAL NETWORK SOCIETY - PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 268 - 271
  • [26] Distributed reinforcement learning in multi-agent networks
    Kar, Soummya
    Moura, Jose M. F.
    Poor, H. Vincent
    2013 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL ADVANCES IN MULTI-SENSOR ADAPTIVE PROCESSING (CAMSAP 2013), 2013, : 296 - +
  • [27] Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Competitive Scenarios
    Coutinho, Manuel
    Reis, Luis Paulo
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS ROBOT SYSTEMS AND COMPETITIONS (ICARSC), 2022, : 130 - 135
  • [28] Specification Aware Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
    Ritz, Fabian
    Phan, Thomy
    Mueller, Robert
    Gabor, Thomas
    Sedlmeier, Andreas
    Zeller, Marc
    Wieghardt, Jan
    Schmid, Reiner
    Sauer, Horst
    Klein, Cornel
    Linnhoff-Popien, Claudia
    AGENTS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, ICAART 2021, 2022, 13251 : 3 - 21
  • [29] Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: a survey
    Sven Gronauer
    Klaus Diepold
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2022, 55 : 895 - 943
  • [30] A Review of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Algorithms
    Liang, Jiaxin
    Miao, Haotian
    Li, Kai
    Tan, Jianheng
    Wang, Xi
    Luo, Rui
    Jiang, Yueqiu
    ELECTRONICS, 2025, 14 (04):