Trade policy uncertainty, development strategy, and export behavior: Evidence from listed industrial companies in China

被引:27
作者
Zhou, Fengxiu
Wen, Huwei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Business, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Res Ctr Cent China Econ & Social Dev, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[3] Nanchang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanchang, Peoples R China
关键词
Trade policy uncertainty; Export behavior; Viability; New structural economics; IMPACT; INVESTMENT; PRODUCTS; DYNAMICS; BREXIT; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101528
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
On the basis of new structural economics theory and heterogeneity of firm viability, this study analyzes the effect of trade policy uncertainty on firm export behavior using panel data of Chinese listed companies in the industrial sector. Empirical results show that the high uncertainty of trade policy significantly inhibits the extensive and intensive margins of firm export, while heteroge-neity effect occurs across firms with different levels of viability. The development strategy that violates comparative advantage strengthens the negative impact of trade policy uncertainty on firm export. Despite their correlation with viability, the type of ownership, total factor produc-tivity, and long-term loan are not suitable proxies for firm viability. Under high uncertainty of trade policy, export market diversification can alleviate the restraining effect of development strategy on firm export, whereas firms in regions with high industrial-oriented development tend to be vulnerable to cost shocks, thus reducing export market diversification. Findings present important implications for emerging market countries to enact better international trade and economic policies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for Canada?
    Awokuse, TO
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2003, 36 (01): : 126 - 136
  • [2] PERSISTENT TRADE EFFECTS OF LARGE EXCHANGE-RATE SHOCKS
    BALDWIN, R
    KRUGMAN, P
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1989, 104 (04) : 635 - 654
  • [3] Carballo Jeronimo., 2018, EC POLICY UNCERTAINT
  • [4] Economic policy uncertainty and firm investment: evidence from the US market
    Chen, Pei-Fen
    Lee, Chien-Chiang
    Zeng, Jhih-Hong
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (31) : 3423 - 3435
  • [5] Export volatility with trade policy uncertainty: Evidence from China*
    Chen, Xiaoping
    Zhao, Xiaotao
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2021, 44 (12) : 3534 - 3549
  • [6] Constantinescu I. C., 2019, REV IND ORGAN, V57, P1
  • [7] Tariff scares: Trade policy uncertainty and foreign market entry by Chinese firms
    Crowley, Meredith
    Meng, Ning
    Song, Huasheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 114 : 96 - 115
  • [8] Davis StevenJ., 2019, Economic Policy Uncertainty in China Since 1949: The View from Mainland Newspapers
  • [9] China's "Great Migration": The impact of the reduction in trade policy uncertainty
    Facchini, Giovanni
    Liu, Maggie Y.
    Mayda, Anna Maria
    Zhou, Minghai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 120 : 126 - 144
  • [10] Trade policy uncertainty and exports: Evidence from China's WTO accession
    Feng, Ling
    Li, Zhiyuan
    Swenson, Deborah L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 106 : 20 - 36