Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the attitudes toward loss of hearing questionnaire

被引:40
作者
Saunders, GH
Cienkowski, KM
机构
[1] LEXINGTON CTR, JACKSON HTS, NY USA
[2] VAMC, E ORANGE, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-199612000-00006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To refine and statistically validate the Attitudes Toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHHQ) so that it will be appropriate for clinical application and to understand some of the personality attributes underlying attitudes toward hearing loss. Design: An American-English version of an ALHQ, originally designed by Brooks (1989), was completed by 226 men; a subset of 80 also completed personality questionnaires. All subjects underwent pure-tone testing and speech audiometry. Factor analysis was used to extract scales from the ALHQ. Reliability analyses using Cronbach's alpha were carried out on each scale. Test-retest reliability was evaluated from questionnaires completed 6 to 18 mo after initial administration. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the audiometric and personality determinants of attitudes. Results: Five reliable scales were extracted from a 24-question version of the ALHQ: 1) Social and Emotional Impact of Hearing Loss, 2) Acceptance/Adjustment to Hearing Loss, 3) Perceived Support from Significant Others, 4) Hearing Aid Stigma, and 5) Awareness of Hearing Loss. Audiometric data explained little of the variance in attitude scores; age and other demographic factors did not correlate with attitudes either. The personality traits of extroversion, self-esteem, and anxiety/neuroticism played a larger role in determining attitude. Conclusions: The ALHQ is psychometrically acceptable and is a potentially useful clinical tool. It is quick and easy to complete and to score and could be used as a basis for counseling and for following attitude change in patients over time.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 519
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Eysenck personality inventory
[3]   LONGITUDINAL-STUDY OF HEARING-AID EFFECTIVENESS .2. SUBJECTIVE MEASURES [J].
BENTLER, RA ;
NIEBUHR, DP ;
GETTA, JP ;
ANDERSON, CV .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (04) :820-831
[4]  
BROOKS, 1995, COMMUNICATION
[5]  
BROOKS D N, 1989, British Journal of Audiology, V23, P3, DOI 10.3109/03005368909077813
[6]  
Cox R M, 1991, J Am Acad Audiol, V2, P134
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROFILE OF HEARING-AID PERFORMANCE (PHAP) [J].
COX, RM ;
GILMORE, C .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 33 (02) :343-357
[8]   A SHORT CLINICAL DIAGNOSTIC SELF-RATING SCALE FOR PSYCHONEUROTIC PATIENTS - MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL QUESTIONNAIRE (MHQ) [J].
CROWN, S ;
CRISP, AH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1966, 112 (490) :917-&
[9]   PSYCHOMETRIC PRINCIPLES IN THE SELECTION, INTERPRETATION, AND EVALUATION OF COMMUNICATION SELF-ASSESSMENT INVENTORIES [J].
DEMOREST, ME ;
WALDEN, BE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1984, 49 (03) :226-240
[10]   RETEST STABILITY OF THE COMMUNICATION PROFILE FOR THE HEARING-IMPAIRED [J].
DEMOREST, ME ;
ERDMAN, SA .
EAR AND HEARING, 1988, 9 (05) :237-242