Improvements in Health Status after Massachusetts Health Care Reform

被引:66
作者
Van der Wees, Philip J. [1 ,2 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [1 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Sci Inst Qual Healthcare, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
health care reform; health care delivery; quality of health care; health status; ACCESS; DISPARITIES; COVERAGE; MEDICAID; REMAINS; UPDATE; COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12029
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ContextMassachusetts enacted health care reform in 2006 to expand insurance coverage and improve access to health care. The objective of our study was to compare trends in health status and the use of ambulatory health services before and after the implementation of health reform in Massachusetts relative to that in other New England states. MethodsWe used a quasi-experimental design with data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System from 2001 to 2011 to compare trends associated with health reform in Massachusetts relative to that in other New England states. We compared self-reported health and the use of preventive services using multivariate logistic regression with difference-in-differences analysis to account for temporal trends. We estimated predicted probabilities and changes in these probabilities to gauge the differential effects between Massachusetts and other New England states. Finally, we conducted subgroup analysis to assess the differential changes by income and race/ethnicity. FindingsThe sample included 345,211 adults aged eighteen to sixty-four. In comparing the periods before and after health care reform relative to those in other New England states, we found that Massachusetts residents reported greater improvements in general health (1.7%), physical health (1.3%), and mental health (1.5%). Massachusetts residents also reported significant relative increases in rates of Pap screening (2.3%), colonoscopy (5.5%), and cholesterol testing (1.4%). Adults in Massachusetts households that earned up to 300% of the federal poverty level gained more in health status than did those above that level, with differential changes ranging from 0.2% to 1.3%. Relative gains in health status were comparable among white, black, and Hispanic residents in Massachusetts. ConclusionsHealth care reform in Massachusetts was associated with improved health status and the greater use of some preventive services relative to those in other New England states, particularly among low-income households. These findings may stem from expanded insurance coverage as well as innovations in health care delivery that accelerated after health reform.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 689
页数:27
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, 17190 NAT BUR EC RES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data
  • [4] Tackling Rising Health Care Costs in Massachusetts
    Ayanian, John Z.
    Van der Wees, Philip J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (09) : 790 - 793
  • [5] The Massachusetts Journey to Expand Health Insurance Coverage
    Ayanian, John Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (02) : 139 - 141
  • [6] The Oregon Experiment - Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes
    Baicker, Katherine
    Taubman, Sarah L.
    Allen, Heidi L.
    Bernstein, Mira
    Gruber, Jonathan H.
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    Schneider, Eric C.
    Wright, Bill J.
    Zaslavsky, Alan M.
    Finkelstein, Amy N.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (18) : 1713 - 1722
  • [7] The Effects of Medicaid Coverage - Learning from the Oregon Experiment
    Baicker, Katherine
    Finkelstein, Amy
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (08) : 683 - 685
  • [8] How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?
    Bertrand, M
    Duflo, E
    Mullainathan, S
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) : 249 - 275
  • [9] Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Calonge, Ned
    Petitti, Diana B.
    DeWitt, Thomas G.
    Dietrich, Allen J.
    Gregory, Kimberly D.
    Grossman, David
    Isham, George
    LeFevre, Michael L.
    Leipzig, Rosanne M.
    Marion, Lucy N.
    Melnyk, Bernadette
    Moyer, Virginia A.
    Ockene, Judith K.
    Sawaya, George F.
    Schwartz, J. Sanford
    Wilt, Timothy
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (10) : 716 - W236
  • [10] CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), 2012, OV BRFSS 2011