Epidural catheter function during labor predicts anesthetic efficacy for subsequent cesarean delivery

被引:42
作者
Riley, ET [1 ]
Papasin, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1054/ijoa.2001.0927
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
One of the benefits of labor epidural analgesia is that the catheter can be used to initiate a surgical block should the need for cesarean delivery arise. However, sometimes it is not possible to obtain adequate surgical anesthesia via a previously placed labor epidural catheter and it is unknown what factors are associated with this failure. We retrospectively investigated the incidence of failure to convert a labor epidural to a successful surgical block in our institution over a period of one year and determined the factors associated with this failure. There were 246 cases in which a patient had an epidural catheter placed for labor and then had a cesarean delivery. Of these 246 cases, 220 developed surgical anesthesia using the catheter. In six cases the anesthesiologist did not attempt to use the epidural catheter for the cesarean delivery. In 20 cases (classified as failed blocks), the catheter was injected, but another method of anesthesia was then used. Factors associated with failure of the epidural block were an increased requirement for supplemental local anesthetic boluses during labor in order to provide adequate analgesia and that the attending anesthesiologist for the cesarean delivery was not a specialist in obstetric anesthesia. Most epidural catheters placed for labor can be used to induce a surgical block. When significantly more local anesthetic than usual is required to maintain analgesia during labor, however, the epidural catheter may not be functioning properly and consideration should be given to replacing it. (C) 2002 published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 84
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Increased risk of unintentional dural puncture in night-time obstetric epidural anesthesia [J].
Aya, AGM ;
Mangin, R ;
Robert, C ;
Ferrer, JM ;
Eledjam, JJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (07) :665-669
[2]   ALKALINIZATION IMPROVES THE QUALITY OF LIDOCAINE-FENTANYL EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
CAPOGNA, G ;
CELLENO, D ;
COSTANTINO, P ;
MURATORI, F ;
SEBASTIANI, M ;
BALDASSINI, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (05) :425-430
[3]   EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF BUPIVACAINE, CHLOROPROCAINE, AND ETIDOCAINE [J].
DATTA, S ;
CORKE, BC ;
ALPER, MH ;
BROWN, WU ;
OSTHEIMER, GW ;
WEISS, JB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1980, 52 (01) :48-51
[4]   Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: A retrospective chart review [J].
Eappen, S ;
Blinn, A ;
Segal, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1998, 7 (04) :220-225
[5]   COMPARISON OF PLAIN AND ALKALINIZED LOCAL-ANESTHETIC MIXTURES OF LIGNOCAINE AND BUPIVACAINE FOR ELECTIVE EXTRADURAL CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
FERNANDO, R ;
JONES, HM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 67 (06) :699-703
[6]   RISK OF HIGH SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOLLOWING FAILED EPIDURAL BLOCK FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY [J].
FURST, SR ;
REISNER, LS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (01) :71-74
[7]   The rate of successful reactivation of labor epidural catheters for postpartum tubal ligation surgery [J].
Goodman, EJ ;
Dumas, SD .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 1998, 23 (03) :258-261
[8]   Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement [J].
Hamilton, CL ;
Riley, ET ;
Cohen, SE .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (04) :778-784
[9]   Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States, 1979-1990 [J].
Hawkins, JL ;
Koonin, LM ;
Palmer, SK ;
Gibbs, CP .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (02) :277-284
[10]   An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery [J].
Hess, PE ;
Pratt, SD ;
Soni, AK ;
Sama, MC ;
Oriol, NE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (04) :881-886