Mobilizing social support networks to improve cancer screening: the COACH randomized controlled trial study design

被引:23
作者
Mbah, Olive [1 ]
Ford, Jean G. [2 ]
Qiu, Miaozhen [3 ]
Wenzel, Jennifer [1 ,4 ]
Bone, Lee [5 ]
Bowie, Janice [5 ]
Elmi, Ahmed [1 ]
Slade, Jimmie L. [6 ]
Towson, Michele [7 ]
Dobs, Adrian S. [8 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Einstein Healthcare Network, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, Dept Med Oncol, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Nursing, Dept Acute & Chron Care, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Soc, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Community Minist Prince Georges Cty, Upper Marlboro, MD USA
[7] Maxwell Enterprises, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
BMC CANCER | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Cancer screening; African Americans; Older adults; Family patient navigators; CBPR; BREAST-CANCER; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; PATIENT NAVIGATION; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH LITERACY; PRIMARY-CARE; SURVIVAL; WOMEN; CARCINOMA; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1920-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Disadvantaged populations face many barriers to cancer care, including limited support in navigating through the complexities of the healthcare system. Family members play an integral role in caring for patients and provide valuable care coordination; however, the effect of family navigators on adherence to cancer screening has not previously been evaluated. Training and evaluating trusted family members and other support persons may improve cancer outcomes for vulnerable patients. Methods: Guided by principles of community based participatory research (CBPR), "Evaluating Coaches of Older Adults for Cancer Care and Healthy Behaviors (COACH)" is a community-based randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a trained participant-designated coach (support person or care giver) in navigating cancer-screening for older African American adults, 50-74 years old. Participants are randomly assigned as dyads (participant + coach pair) to receiving either printed educational materials only (PEM-control group) or educational materials plus coach training (COACH-intervention group). We defined a coach as family member, friend, or other lay support person designated by the older adult. The coach training is designed as a one-time, 35- to 40-minute training consisting of: 1) a didactic session that covers the role of the coach, basic facts about colorectal, breast and cervical cancers (including risk factors, signs and symptoms and screening modalities), engaging the healthcare provider in cancer screening, insurance coverage for screening, and related healthcare issues, 2) three video skits addressing misconceptions about and planning for cancer screening, and 3) an interactive role-play session with the trainer to reinforce and practice strategies for encouraging the participant to get screened. The primary study outcome is the difference in the proportion of participants completing at least one of the recommended screenings (for breast, cervix or colorectal cancer) between the control and intervention groups. Discussion: Building on trusted patient contacts to encourage cancer screening, COACH is a highly sustainable intervention in a high-risk population. It has the potential to minimize the effect of mistrust of the medical establishment on screening behaviors by mobilizing participants' existing support networks. If effective, the intervention could have a high impact on health care disparities research across multiple diseases.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mobilizing social support networks to improve cancer screening: the COACH randomized controlled trial study design
    Olive Mbah
    Jean G. Ford
    Miaozhen Qiu
    Jennifer Wenzel
    Lee Bone
    Janice Bowie
    Ahmed Elmi
    Jimmie L. Slade
    Michele Towson
    Adrian S. Dobs
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [2] Impact of a Randomized Controlled Educational Trial to Improve Physician Practice Behaviors Around Screening for Inherited Breast Cancer
    Bell, Robert A.
    McDermott, Haley
    Fancher, Tonya L.
    Green, Michael J.
    Day, Frank C.
    Wilkes, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (03) : 334 - 341
  • [3] Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Christy, Shannon M.
    Perkins, Susan M.
    Tong, Yan
    Krier, Connie
    Champion, Victoria L.
    Skinner, Celette Sugg
    Springston, Jeffrey K.
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    Rawl, Susan M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [4] Mediated decision support in prostate cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial of decision counseling
    Myers, Ronald E.
    Daskalakis, Constantine
    Kunkel, Elisabeth J. S.
    Cocroft, James R.
    Riggio, Jeffrey M.
    Capkin, Mark
    Braddock, Clarence H., III
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 83 (02) : 240 - 246
  • [5] Effect of Patient Navigation on Breast Cancer Screening Among African American Medicare Beneficiaries: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Marshall, Jessie Kimbrough
    Mbah, Olive M.
    Ford, Jean G.
    Phelan-Emrick, Darcy
    Ahmed, Saifuddin
    Bone, Lee
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Shapiro, Gary R.
    Howerton, Mollie
    Johnson, Lawrence
    Brown, Qiana
    Ewing, Altovise
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (01) : 68 - 76
  • [6] Lay Health Educators Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Hmong Americans: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tong, Elisa K.
    Nguyen, Tung T.
    Lo, Penny
    Stewart, Susan L.
    Gildengorin, Ginny L.
    Tsoh, Janice Y.
    Jo, Angela M.
    Kagawa-Singer, Marjorie L.
    Sy, Angela U.
    Cuaresma, Charlene
    Lam, Hy T.
    Wong, Ching
    Tran, Mi T.
    Chen, Moon S., Jr.
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (01) : 98 - 106
  • [7] Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening - A randomized controlled trial
    Chaudhry, Rajeev
    Scheitel, Sidna M.
    McMurtry, Erin K.
    Leutink, Dorinda J.
    Cabanela, Rosa L.
    Naessens, James M.
    Rahman, Ahmed S.
    Davis, Lynn A.
    Stroebel, Robert J.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (06) : 606 - 611
  • [8] A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Rural Family Medicine: An Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study
    Levy, Barcey T.
    Xu, Yinghui
    Daly, Jeanette M.
    Ely, John W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (05) : 486 - 497
  • [9] Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Multimodal Intervention to Improve Cancer Screening Rates in a Safety-Net Primary Care Practice
    Hendren, Samantha
    Winters, Paul
    Humiston, Sharon
    Idris, Amna
    Li, Shirley X. L.
    Ford, Patricia
    Specht, Raymond
    Marcus, Stephen
    Mendoza, Michael
    Fiscella, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [10] The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Temucin, Elif
    Nahcivan, Nursen O.
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (01) : 112 - 124