A further study of the recovery purification of surfactin from fermentation broth by membrane filtration

被引:32
作者
Isa, Mohd Hafez Mom [1 ]
Frazier, Richard A. [1 ]
Jauregi, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Food Biosci, Reading RG6 2AP, Berks, England
关键词
Surfactin; Ultrafiltration (UF); Flux (LMH); Rejection coefficient (R); Regenerated cellulose (RC); Polyethersulfone (PES);
D O I
10.1016/j.seppur.2008.09.008
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Surfactin is a bacterial lipopeptide produced by Bacillus subtilis and is a powerful surfactant, having also antiviral, antibacterial and antitumor properties. The recovery and purification of surfactin from complex fermentation broths is a major obstacle to its commercialization; therefore, a two-step membrane filtration process was developed using a lab scale tangential flow filtration (TFF) unit with 10 kDa MWCO regenerated cellulose (RC) and polyethersulfone (PES) membranes at three different transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 1.5 bar, 2.0 bar and 2.5 bar. Two modes of filtrations were studied, with and without cleaning of membranes prior to UF-2. In a first step of ultrafiltration (UF-1), surfactin was retained effectively by membranes at above its critical micelle concentration (CMC); subsequently in UF-2, the retentate micelles were disrupted by addition of 50% (v/v) methanol solution to allow recovery of surfactin in the permeate. Main protein contaminants were effectively retained by the membrane in UF-2. Flux of permeates, rejection coefficient (R) of surfactin and protein were measured during the filtrations. Overall the three different TMPs applied have no significant effect in the filtrations and PES is the more suitable membrane to selectively separate surfactin from fermentation broth, achieving high recovery and level of purity. In addition this two-step UF process is scalable for larger volume of samples without affecting the original functionality of surfactin, although membranes permeability can be affected due to exposure to methanolic solution used in UF-2. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 182
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1989, PROTEIN PURIFICATION
  • [2] Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules
    Cameotra, SS
    Makkar, RS
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 7 (03) : 262 - 266
  • [3] Molecular mechanism of membrane permeabilization by the peptide antibiotic surfactin
    Carrillo, C
    Teruel, JA
    Aranda, FJ
    Ortiz, A
    [J]. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES, 2003, 1611 (1-2): : 91 - 97
  • [4] Recovery of surfactin from fermentation broths by a hybrid salting-out and membrane filtration process
    Chen, Huei-Li
    Chen, Ying-Shr
    Juang, Ruey-Shin
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (03) : 244 - 252
  • [5] Separation of surfactin from fermentation broths by acid precipitation and two-stage dead-end ultrafiltration processes
    Chen, Huei-Li
    Chen, Ying-Shr
    Juang, Ruey-Shin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 299 (1-2) : 114 - 121
  • [6] Cheryan M., 1998, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook
  • [7] ENHANCED PRODUCTION OF SURFACTIN FROM BACILLUS-SUBTILIS BY CONTINUOUS PRODUCT REMOVAL AND METAL CATION ADDITIONS
    COOPER, DG
    MACDONALD, CR
    DUFF, SJB
    KOSARIC, N
    [J]. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1981, 42 (03) : 408 - 412
  • [8] The production of Surfactin in batch culture by Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 is strongly influenced by the conditions of nitrogen metabolism
    Davis, DA
    Lynch, HC
    Varley, J
    [J]. ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 25 (3-5) : 322 - 329
  • [9] Interfacial and emulsifying properties of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis
    Deleu, M
    Razafindralambo, H
    Popineau, Y
    Jacques, P
    Thonart, P
    Paquot, M
    [J]. COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1999, 152 (1-2) : 3 - 10
  • [10] Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential
    Desai, JD
    Banat, IM
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 61 (01) : 47 - &