Performance evaluation of reverse osmosis (RO) pre-treatment technologies for in-land brackish water treatment

被引:64
作者
Khanzada, N. K. [1 ]
Khan, S. Jamal [1 ]
Davies, P. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Islamabad, Pakistan
[2] Aston Univ, Sustainable Environm Res Grp, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Brackish water; Reverse osmosis (RO); Forward osmosis (FO); Ultrafiltration (UF); Rejection efficiency; Permeate TDS; SEAWATER DESALINATION; WASTE-WATER; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; OPTIMIZATION; RECLAMATION; CHALLENGES; RECOVERY; ENERGY; BORON;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2016.06.030
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Integration of renewable energy with desalination technologies has emerged as an attractive solution to augment fresh water supply sustainably. Fouling and scaling are still considered as limiting factors in membrane desalination processes. For brackish water treatment, pre-treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) feed water is a key step in designing RO plants avoiding membrane fouling. This study aims to compare at pilot scale the rejection efficiency of RO membranes with multiple pre-treatment options at different water recoveries (30, 35, 40, 45 and 50%) and TDS concentrations (3500,4000, and 4500 mg/L). Synthetic brackish water was prepared and performance evaluation were carried out using brackish water reverse osmosis (BVVRO) membranes (Filmtec LC-LE-4040 and Hydranautics CPA5-LD-4040) preceded by 5 and 1 mu m cartridge filters, 0.02 pm ultra-filtration (UF) membrane, and forward osmosis (FO) membrane using 0.25 M NaCl and MgCl2 as draw solutions (DS). It was revealed that FO membrane with 0.25 M MgCl2 used as a draw solution (DS) and Ultra-filtration (UF) membrane followed by Filmtec membrane gave overall 98% rejection but UF facing high fouling potential due to high applied pressure. Use of 5 and 1 mu m cartridge filter prior to Filmtec membrane also showed effective results with 95% salt rejection. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   High recovery rate NF-FO-RO hybrid system for inland brackish water treatment [J].
Altaee, Ali ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2015, 363 :19-25
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, FILTR SEPARAT, V47, P30
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 21 issues for the 21st Century: results of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental issues
[4]  
[Anonymous], MARK PROF DES MARK 2
[5]   Performance evaluation of BWRO desalination plant - A case study [J].
Arras, W. ;
Ghaffour, N. ;
Hamou, A. .
DESALINATION, 2009, 235 (1-3) :170-178
[6]  
Bhutta MN, 2005, GROUNDWATER RES MANA, P105
[7]   Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination [J].
Brehant, A ;
Bonnelye, V ;
Perez, M .
DESALINATION, 2002, 144 (1-3) :353-360
[8]   Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater [J].
Cath, TY ;
Adams, D ;
Childress, AE .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 257 (1-2) :111-119
[9]   Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments [J].
Cath, Tzahi Y. ;
Childress, Amy E. ;
Elimelech, Menachem .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) :70-87
[10]   Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge [J].
Cornelissen, E. R. ;
Harmsen, D. ;
de Korte, K. F. ;
Ruiken, C. J. ;
Qin, Jian-Jun ;
Oo, H. ;
Wessels, L. P. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 319 (1-2) :158-168