共 25 条
Software for automated classification of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy videos of colorectal polyps
被引:53
作者:
Andre, Barbara
[1
,2
]
Vercauteren, Tom
[1
]
Buchner, Anna M.
[3
]
Krishna, Murli
Ayache, Nicholas
[2
]
Wallace, Michael B.
[4
]
机构:
[1] Mauna Kea Technol, Image Comp Grp, F-75010 Paris, France
[2] Natl Inst Res Comp Sci & Control Sophia Antipolis, Asclepios Res Team, F-06902 Sophia Antipolis, France
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Div Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Mayo Clin Hosp Jacksonville, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词:
Colorectal neoplasia;
Computer-aided diagnosis;
Content-based image retrieval;
Nearest neighbor classification software;
Probe-based confocal laser;
endomicroscopy;
VIENNA CLASSIFICATION;
CANCER;
COLONOSCOPY;
DIAGNOSIS;
HISTOLOGY;
MINIPROBE;
ACCURACY;
D O I:
10.3748/wjg.v18.i39.5560
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
AIM: To support probe-based confocal laser endonnicroscopy (pCLE) diagnosis by designing software for the automated classification of colonic polyps. METHODS: Intravenous fluorescein pCLE imaging of colorectal lesions was performed on patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopies, followed by polypectomies. All resected specimens were reviewed by a reference gastrointestinal pathologist blinded to pCLE information. Histopathology was used as the criterion standard for the differentiation between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. The pCLE video sequences, recorded for each polyp, were analyzed off-line by 2 expert endoscopists who were blinded to the endoscopic characteristics and histopathology. These pCLE videos, along with their histopathology diagnosis, were used to train the automated classification software which is a content-based image retrieval technique followed by k-nearest neighbor classification. The performance of the off-line diagnosis of pCLE videos established by the 2 expert endoscopists was compared with that of automated pCLE software classification. All evaluations were performed using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation to avoid bias. RESULTS: Colorectal lesions (135) were imaged in 71 patients. Based on histopathology, 93 of these 135 lesions were neoplastic and 42 were non-neoplastic. The study found no statistical significance for the difference between the performance of automated pCLE software classification (accuracy 89.6%, sensitivity 92.5%, specificity 83.3%, using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation) and the performance of the off-line diagnosis of pCLE videos established by the 2 expert endoscopists (accuracy 89.6%, sensitivity 91.4%, specificity 85.7%). There was very low power (< 6%) to detect the observed differences. The 95% confidence intervals for equivalence testing were: -0.073 to 0.073 for accuracy, -0.068 to 0.089 for sensitivity and -0.18 to 0.13 for specificity. The classification software proposed in this study is not a "black box" but an informative tool based on the query by example model that produces, as intermediate results, visually similar annotated videos that are directly interpretable by the endoscopist. CONCLUSION: The proposed software for automated classification of pCLE videos of colonic polyps achieves high performance, comparable to that of off-line diagnosis of pCLE videos established by expert endoscopists. (C) 2012 Baishideng. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5560 / 5569
页数:10
相关论文