The Right to Health Care as a Right to Basic Human Functional Capabilities

被引:20
作者
Ram-Tiktin, Efrat [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Philosophy, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
Right to health care; Sufficiency; Capabilities; Patients' prioritization; PREFERENCES; SUFFICIENCY; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1007/s10677-011-9322-7
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
A just social arrangement must guarantee a right to health care for all. This right should be understood as a positive right to basic human functional capabilities. The present article aims to delineate the right to health care as part of an account of distributive justice in health care in terms of the sufficiency of basic human functional capabilities. According to the proposed account, every individual currently living beneath the sufficiency threshold or in jeopardy of falling beneath the threshold has a legitimate claim to justice. People's entitlements to health care should not be determined on the basis of brute luck and their efforts to maintain healthy lifestyles. The prioritization of competing claim-rights of individuals is guided by two allocation principles: number and benefit-size weighted sufficiency (among people beneath the threshold) and need-weighted utilitarianism (among people above the threshold).
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 351
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTS ADOLESCENT E
[2]  
[Anonymous], RIGHTS HLTH CARE
[3]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS ISSUES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, WOMEN HUMAN DEV CAPA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, PHILOS ESSAYS
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS BAR ILAN U IS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HLTH LUCK JUSTICE
[8]  
Aristotle, 1998, NICOMACHEAN ETHICS
[9]   Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism [J].
Arneson, RJ .
ETHICS, 2000, 110 (02) :339-349
[10]   Sufficiency or priority? [J].
Benbaji, Yitzhak .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2006, 14 (03) :327-348