The 2018 International Consensus Meeting Minor Criteria for Chronic Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Validation From a Single Center

被引:25
作者
Abdelaziz, Hussein [1 ]
Rademacher, Kristof [1 ,2 ]
Suero, Eduardo M. [3 ]
Gehrke, Thorsten [1 ]
Lausmann, Christian [1 ]
Salber, Jochen [2 ]
Citak, Mustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Helios ENDO Klin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Holstenstr 2, D-22767 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Bochum, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Trauma & Reconstruct Surg, Munich, Germany
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; total knee arthroplasty; periprosthetic joint infection; minor criteria; international consensus meeting; validation; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recently, a revised definition of the minor criteria scoring system for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was developed by the second International Consensus Meeting on musculoskeletal infection. The new system combines preoperative and intraoperative findings, reportedly achieving high sensitivity and specificity. We aimed to validate the modified scoring system at a high-volume center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a revision total hip or knee arthroplasty at our institution from May 2015 to August 2018. Serum C-reactive protein, synovial white blood cell count and polymorphonuclear percentage, leukocyte esterase test, alpha-defensin, microbiological and histologic results, and documented existence of sinus tract and intraoperative purulence were available for all patients. Cases with at least 1 major criterion were considered as infected. Using the new minor criteria, a score of >= 6 reflects PJI, while a score <3 can be considered as noninfected. Sensitivity, specificity, mean accuracy (ACC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were analyzed. Results: A total of 345 cases were included. A cutoff score of >= 6 points had the following diagnostic performance: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90; ACC = 0.88; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.84; PPV = 0.70; NPV = 0.98. Diagnostic performance was better for the hip (AUC = 0.92; ACC = 0.90; sensitivity = 0.96; specificity = 0.86; PPV = 0.81; NPV = 0.98) than the knee (AUC = 0.89; ACC = 0.85; sensitivity = 0.95; specificity = 0.83; PPV = 0.59; NPV = 0.98). Conclusion: The modified scoring system proposed by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting in diagnosing PJI showed high sensitivity and a good performance, especially as rule-out diagnostic criteria. The cutoff level seems to be different between the hip and knee. Further validation studies considering the acknowledged limitations are recommended. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2200 / 2203
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Threshold for Serological Markers
    Alijanipour, Pouya
    Bakhshi, Hooman
    Parvizi, Javad
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (10) : 3186 - 3195
  • [2] Current Recommendations for the Diagnosis of Acute and Chronic PJI for Hip and Knee—Cell Counts, Alpha-Defensin, Leukocyte Esterase, Next-generation Sequencing
    Goswami K.
    Parvizi J.
    Maxwell Courtney P.
    [J]. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2018, 11 (3) : 428 - 438
  • [3] The 2018 new definition of periprosthetic joint infection improves the diagnostic efficiency in the Chinese population
    Guan, Haitao
    Fu, Jun
    Li, Xiang
    Chai, Wei
    Hao, Libo
    Li, Rui
    Zhao, Jing
    Chen, Jiying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [4] Are All Periprosthetic Joint Infections the Same? Evaluating Major vs Minor Criteria
    Klement, Mitchell R.
    Siddiqi, Ahmed
    Rock, Justin M.
    Seyler, Thorsten M.
    Parvizi, Javad
    Chen, Antonia F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (05) : 1515 - 1519
  • [5] Lee YS, 2017, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V99, P2077, DOI [10.2106/jbjs.17.00123, 10.2106/JBJS.17.00123]
  • [6] Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection
    Matthews, Philippa C.
    Berendt, Anthony R.
    McNally, Martin A.
    Byren, Ivor
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1378 - 1383
  • [7] Evidence-Based Validation of Diagnostic Criteria for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Major Step Forward!
    Mont, Michael A.
    Backstein, David J.
    Krebs, Viktor E.
    Mason, J. Bohannon
    Taunton, Michael J.
    Callaghan, John J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (05) : 1307 - 1308
  • [8] The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria
    Parvizi, Javad
    Tan, Timothy L.
    Goswami, Karan
    Higuera, Carlos
    Della Valle, Craig
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Shohat, Noam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (05) : 1309 - +
  • [9] Definition of Periprosthetic Joint Infection
    Parvizi, Javad
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (07) : 1331 - 1331
  • [10] Definition of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Is There a Consensus?
    Parvizi, Javad
    Jacovides, Christina
    Zmistowski, Benjamin
    Jung, Kwang Am
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (11) : 3022 - 3030