Does enhancement of specific immune responses predispose laying hens for feather pecking?

被引:33
|
作者
Parmentier, H. K. [1 ]
Rodenburg, T. B. [2 ]
Reilingh, G. De Vries [1 ]
Beerda, B. [1 ]
Kemp, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Adaptat Physiol Grp, NL-6709 PG Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, Dept Anim Sci, NL-6709 PG Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
pathogen-associated molecular pattern; human serum albumin; chicken; intratracheal; feather pecking; PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS; ANTIBODY-RESPONSES; MOLECULAR-PATTERNS; STRESS-RESPONSE; MAP KINASES; BEHAVIOR; POULTRY; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE; INTERLEUKIN-1-BETA; REACTIVITY;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2008-00424
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
To mimic airborne immune challenges, layer hens were intratracheally and concurrently challenged with various doses of the protein antigen human serum albumin (HuSA) and the pathogen-associated molecular pattern lipopolysaccharide (LPS) at 7 and 13 wk of age. All groups received 1 similar dose of HuSA plus LPS at 11 mo of age. Evaluation of plumage and body condition at 12 mo of age revealed that birds that had undergone intratracheal immunization with a high dosage of HuSA, irrespective of the concurrent dose of LPS, had significantly more feather damage but less wounds to the vent region, as opposed to birds not receiving HuSA. On the other hand, a high dosage of LPS was related to comb damage. These results suggest that stimulation of specific (humoral) immune responses (to HuSA) rather than innate responses (to LPS) at a young age may predispose layers for feather pecking (FP) behavior at later ages. Involvement of immune mechanisms in FP or vent damage may differ. Predisposal for FP behavior by specific immunity can have consequences for health and vaccine management.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 542
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Novel Model to Explain Extreme Feather Pecking Behavior in Laying Hens
    Iffland, H.
    Wellmann, R.
    Preuss, S.
    Tetens, J.
    Bessei, W.
    Piepho, H. -P.
    Bennewitz, J.
    BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2020, 50 (01) : 41 - 50
  • [32] Applying chemical stimuli on feathers to reduce feather pecking in laying hens
    Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2011, 132 (3-4) : 146 - 151
  • [33] Feather Pecking of Laying Hens in Different Stocking Density and Type of Cage
    Khumput, S.
    Muangchum, S.
    Yodprom, S.
    Panyasak, A.
    Thiengtham, J.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 9 (03): : 549 - 556
  • [34] Dustbathing and pecking behaviour in chicks from a high and a low feather pecking line of laying hens
    Johnsen, PF
    Vestergaard, KS
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1996, 49 (03) : 237 - 246
  • [35] Development of a prognostic tool for the occurrence of feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens
    Kaesberg, A. -K. U.
    Louton, H.
    Erhard, M.
    Schmidt, P.
    Zepp, M.
    Helmer, F.
    Schwarzer, A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2018, 97 (03) : 820 - 833
  • [36] Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens
    Bestman, MWP
    Wagenaar, JP
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (1-2): : 133 - 140
  • [37] The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles
    Rodenburg, T. B.
    van Krimpen, M. M.
    de Jong, I. C.
    de Haas, E. N.
    Kops, M. S.
    Riedstra, B. J.
    Nordquist, R. E.
    Wagenaar, J. P.
    Bestman, M.
    Nicol, C. J.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2013, 69 (02) : 361 - 373
  • [38] Rearing factors that influence the propensity for injurious feather pecking in laying hens
    van de Weerd, H. A.
    Elson, A.
    WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2006, 62 (04) : 654 - 664
  • [39] Effect of manipulating feathers of laying hens on the incidence of feather pecking and cannibalism
    McAdie, TM
    Keeling, LJ
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2000, 68 (03) : 215 - 229
  • [40] Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens
    Aerni, V
    El-Lethey, H
    Wechsler, B
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (01) : 16 - 21