Checkerboard: a Bayesian efficacy and toxicity interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials

被引:7
作者
Yin, Jun [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Model-assisted design; phase I; II clinical trial; dose-finding; adaptive Bayesian designs; biomarker surrogate; dual endpoints; I CLINICAL-TRIALS; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2020.1815033
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The rise of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has challenged the conventional more-is-better phase I trial design paradigm that focuses on finding the MTD. In this article, we propose a novel model-assisted phase I/II design, called checkerboard design, that considers both toxicity and efficacy. As an extension of the keyboard design, the checkerboard design models the joint distribution of toxicity and efficacy, and divides toxicity and efficacy domain into a series of equal-width intervals or keys. In light of interim data, the checkerboard design continuously updates the posterior distribution of toxicity and efficacy, and adaptively determine the optimal dose for treating the next cohort of patients based on the posterior probability of toxicity and efficacy keys. As a model-assisted design, one important advantage of the checkerboard design is that its decision rule can be pretabulated, greatly simplifying its implementation. We also extend the checkerboard design to handle continuous efficacy endpoint. Simulations study shows that the checkerboard design yields competitive performance comparable to existing model-based phase I/II designs, but is simpler and easier to implement in real applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1025
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [11] LIN R, 2019, J BIOPHARM STAT 0630, DOI DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz007
  • [12] Bayesian optimal interval designs for phase I clinical trials
    Liu, Suyu
    Yuan, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2015, 64 (03) : 507 - 523
  • [13] CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD - A PRACTICAL DESIGN FOR PHASE-1 CLINICAL-TRIALS IN CANCER
    OQUIGLEY, J
    PEPE, M
    FISHER, L
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [14] Ratain M. J., 2018, J CLIN ONCOLOGY OFFI, V46
  • [15] Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials
    Rogatko, Andre
    Schoeneck, David
    Jonas, William
    Tighiouart, Mourad
    Khuri, Fadlo R.
    Porter, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (31) : 4982 - 4986
  • [16] An evaluation of phase I clinical trial designs in the continuous dose-response setting
    Storer, BE
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (16) : 2399 - 2408
  • [17] BOIN-ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes
    Takeda, Kentaro
    Taguri, Masataka
    Morita, Satoshi
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 17 (04) : 383 - 395
  • [18] Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs
    Thall, PF
    Cook, JD
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) : 684 - 693
  • [19] The performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I clinical trials in oncology A quantitative comparison of the performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I trials with molecularly targeted anticancer drugs over the last 2 years
    van Brummelen, E. M. J.
    Huitema, A. D. R.
    van Werkhoven, E.
    Beijnen, J. H.
    Schellens, J. H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2016, 43 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [20] Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials
    Yan, Fangrong
    Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
    Yuan, Ying
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (15) : 3994 - 4003