Checkerboard: a Bayesian efficacy and toxicity interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials

被引:7
作者
Yin, Jun [1 ]
Yuan, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Model-assisted design; phase I; II clinical trial; dose-finding; adaptive Bayesian designs; biomarker surrogate; dual endpoints; I CLINICAL-TRIALS; CONTINUAL REASSESSMENT METHOD; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2020.1815033
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The rise of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has challenged the conventional more-is-better phase I trial design paradigm that focuses on finding the MTD. In this article, we propose a novel model-assisted phase I/II design, called checkerboard design, that considers both toxicity and efficacy. As an extension of the keyboard design, the checkerboard design models the joint distribution of toxicity and efficacy, and divides toxicity and efficacy domain into a series of equal-width intervals or keys. In light of interim data, the checkerboard design continuously updates the posterior distribution of toxicity and efficacy, and adaptively determine the optimal dose for treating the next cohort of patients based on the posterior probability of toxicity and efficacy keys. As a model-assisted design, one important advantage of the checkerboard design is that its decision rule can be pretabulated, greatly simplifying its implementation. We also extend the checkerboard design to handle continuous efficacy endpoint. Simulations study shows that the checkerboard design yields competitive performance comparable to existing model-based phase I/II designs, but is simpler and easier to implement in real applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1025
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Babb J, 1998, STAT MED, V17, P1103, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1103::AID-SIM793>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-9
  • [3] A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial
    Bekele, BN
    Shen, Y
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) : 344 - 354
  • [4] FDA, 2014, 125554ORIG FDA
  • [5] Nivolumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Previously Treated Squamous or Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Feng, Yan
    Wang, Xiaoning
    Bajaj, Gaurav
    Agrawal, Shruti
    Bello, Akintunde
    Lestini, Brian
    Finckenstein, Friedrich Graf
    Park, Jong-Soon
    Roy, Amit
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 23 (18) : 5394 - 5405
  • [6] Phase I Trial of Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Cancer
    Hurwitz, Herbert I.
    Dowlati, Afshin
    Saini, Shermini
    Savage, Shawna
    Suttle, A. Benjamin
    Gibson, Diana M.
    Hodge, Jeffrey P.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    Pandite, Lini
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (12) : 4220 - 4227
  • [7] A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3+3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Wilton, Andrew S.
    Riedel, Elyn R.
    Seshan, Venkatraman E.
    Spriggs, David R.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (05) : 465 - 477
  • [8] Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals
    Ji, Yuan
    Li, Yisheng
    Bekele, B. Nebiyou
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 4 (03) : 235 - 244
  • [9] Using Data Augmentation to Facilitate Conduct of Phase I-II Clinical Trials With Delayed Outcomes
    Jin, Ick Hoon
    Liu, Suyu
    Thall, Peter F.
    Yuan, Ying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 109 (506) : 525 - 536
  • [10] A COMPARISON OF 2 PHASE-I TRIAL DESIGNS
    KORN, EL
    MIDTHUNE, D
    CHEN, TT
    RUBINSTEIN, LV
    CHRISTIAN, MC
    SIMON, RM
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (18) : 1799 - 1806