Prognostic importance of FGF2 and FGFR1 expression for patients affected by ameloblastoma

被引:3
作者
Fonseca, Felipe Paiva [1 ]
Benites, Bernar Monteiro [2 ]
Soares, Ciro Dantas [3 ]
de Lima Morais, Thayna Melo [3 ]
do Amaral-Silva, Gleyson Kleber [3 ]
de Almeida, Oslei Paes [3 ]
Soares, Fernando Augusto [4 ]
Fregnani, Eduardo Rodrigues [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Oral Surg & Pathol, Sch Dent, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Sirio Libanes Hosp, Dept Oral Med, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Campinas Piracicaba, Dept Oral Diag, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Piracicaba, Brazil
[4] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
ameloblastoma; fibroblast growth factor; fibroblast growth factor receptor; odontogenic tumors; FIBROBLAST GROWTH-FACTORS; FACTOR RECEPTOR FAMILY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL LOCALIZATION; SIGNALING NETWORK; CELLS; IMMUNOLOCALIZATION; CARCINOMA; MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jop.12695
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundFibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and FGF receptor 1 (FGFR1) have been investigated in different human neoplasms and were shown to play important roles in the pathogenesis of these diseases; however, very few are known regarding their prognostic importance in the context of ameloblastoma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the expression of FGF2 and FGFR1 is associated with ameloblastoma clinical behavior. MethodsFifty-eight cases of ameloblastoma arranged in tissue microarray were submitted to immunohistochemistry against FGF2 and FGFR1. Clinicopathological parameters regarding sex, age, tumor size, duration and location, treatment, recurrences, radiographic features, cortical disruptions, and follow-up data were obtained from patients' medical records and correlated with the molecules expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the prognostic potential of the biomarkers. ResultsForty-four cases (75.9%) exhibited cytoplasmic positivity for FGF2 in central and peripheral epithelial cells, 46 of 58 (79.3%) showed FGFR1 cytoplasmic positivity predominantly in the columnar peripheral cells, and 43 cases (74.1%) were positive for both. Expression of FGF2 and FGF2+FGFR1 was associated with tumor recurrences (P=.05). However, univariate and multivariate analyses did not demonstrate a significant influence of FGF2, FGFR1, or FGF2+FGFR1 in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (P=.27, P=.33, and P=.25, respectively). ConclusionCytoplasmic expression of FGF2 and FGF2+FGFR1 is associated with ameloblastoma recurrence, but FGF2 and FGFR1 are not determinants of a lower DFS.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 424
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   Immunohistochemical localization of fibroblast growth factors FGF-1 and FGF-2, and receptors FGFR2 and FGFR3 in the epithelium of human odontogenic cysts and tumors [J].
So, F ;
Daley, TD ;
Jackson, L ;
Wysocki, GP .
JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2001, 30 (07) :428-433
[22]   Identification of recurrent SMO and BRAF mutations in ameloblastomas [J].
Sweeney, Robert T. ;
McClary, Andrew C. ;
Myers, Benjamin R. ;
Biscocho, Jewison ;
Neahring, Lila ;
Kwei, Kevin A. ;
Qu, Kunbin ;
Gong, Xue ;
Ng, Tony ;
Jones, Carol D. ;
Varma, Sushama ;
Odegaard, Justin I. ;
Sugiyama, Toshihiro ;
Koyota, Souichi ;
Rubin, Brian P. ;
Troxell, Megan L. ;
Pelham, Robert J. ;
Zehnder, James L. ;
Beachy, Philip A. ;
Pollack, Jonathan R. ;
West, Robert B. .
NATURE GENETICS, 2014, 46 (07) :722-725
[23]   BRAF inhibitor treatment of primary BRAF-mutant ameloblastoma with pathologic assessment of response [J].
Tan, Serena ;
Pollack, Jonathan R. ;
Kaplan, Michael J. ;
Colevas, A. Dimitri ;
West, Robert B. .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 122 (01) :E5-E7
[24]   Dysregulated FGF signalling in neoplastic disorders [J].
Tanner, Yasmine ;
Grose, Richard P. .
SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 53 :126-135
[25]   FGF-2 regulates enamel and dentine formation in mouse tooth germ [J].
Tsuboi, T ;
Mizutani, S ;
Nakano, M ;
Hirukawa, K ;
Togari, A .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 73 (05) :496-501