Combined ASRGL1 and p53 immunohistochemistry as an independent predictor of survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

被引:18
作者
Huvila, Jutta [1 ]
Laajala, Teemu D. [2 ,3 ]
Edqvist, Per-Henrik [4 ]
Mardinoglu, Adil [5 ,6 ]
Talve, Lauri [1 ]
Ponten, Fredrik [4 ]
Grenman, Seija [7 ]
Carpen, Olli [1 ,8 ,9 ]
Aittokallio, Tero [2 ,3 ]
Auranen, Annika [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Pl 52, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Pl20, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, FIMM, Inst Mol Med Finland, Pl20, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Uppsala Univ, Sci Life Lab, Dept Immunol Genet & Pathol, BOX256, S-75105 Uppsala, Sweden
[5] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Sci Life Lab, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Biol & Biol Engn, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Univ Turku, Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Pl52, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland
[8] Univ Helsinki, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
[9] Finland HUSIAB, Pl720, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[10] Univ Tampere, Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Pl2000, Tampere 33521, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Risk stratification; Prognostic; Modelling; ASRGL1; p53; L1CAM EXPRESSION; REGULARIZATION PATHS; COORDINATE DESCENT; CANCER; RISK; CLASSIFICATION; PROFILES; DISEASE; UTILITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. In clinical practise, prognostication of endometrial cancer is based on clinicopathological risk factors. The use of immunohistochemistry-based markers as prognostic tools is generally not recommended and a systematic analysis of their utility as a panel is lacking. We evaluated whether an immunohistochemical marker panel could reliably assess endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) outcome independent of clinicopathological information. Methods. A cohort of 306 EEC specimens was profiled using tissue microarray (TMA). Cost- and time-efficient immunohistochemical analysis of well-established tissue biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, MLH1 and p53) and two new biomarkers (L1CAM and ASRGL1) was carried out. Statistical modelling with embedded variable selection was applied on the staining results to identify minimal prognostic panels with maximal prognostic accuracy without compromising generalizability. Results. A panel including p53 and ASRGL1 immunohistochemistry was identified as the most accurate predictor of relapse-free and disease-specific survival. Within this panel, patients were allocated into high- (5.9%), intermediate- (295%) and low- (64.6%) risk groups where high-risk patients had a 30-fold risk (P < 0.001) of dying of EEC compared to the low-risk group. Conclusions. P53 and ASRGL1 immunoprofiling stratifies EEC patients into three risk groups with significantly different outcomes. This simple and easily applicable panel could provide a useful tool in EEC risk stratification and guiding the allocation of treatment modalities. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 180
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Just how accurate are the major risk stratification systems for early-stage endometrial cancer? [J].
Bendifallah, S. ;
Canlorbe, G. ;
Collinet, P. ;
Arsene, E. ;
Huguet, F. ;
Coutant, C. ;
Hudry, D. ;
Graesslin, O. ;
Raimond, E. ;
Touboul, C. ;
Darai, E. ;
Ballester, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 112 (05) :793-801
[2]   L1 cell adhesion molecule is a strong predictor for distant recurrence and overall survival in early stage endometrial cancer: Pooled PORTEC trial results [J].
Bosse, T. ;
Nout, R. A. ;
Stelloo, E. ;
Dreef, E. ;
Nijman, H. W. ;
Juergenliemk-Schulz, I. M. ;
Jobsen, J. J. ;
Creutzberg, C. L. ;
Smit, V. T. H. B. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (15) :2602-2610
[3]   The Human Asparaginase-like Protein 1 hASRGL1 Is an Ntn Hydrolase with β-Aspartyl Peptidase Activity [J].
Cantor, Jason R. ;
Stone, Everett M. ;
Chantranupong, Lynne ;
Georgiou, George .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 48 (46) :11026-11031
[4]   Improved survival with an intact DNA mismatch repair system in endometrial cancer [J].
Cohn, David E. ;
Frankel, Wendy L. ;
Resnick, Kimberly E. ;
Zanagnolo, Vanna L. ;
Copeland, Larry J. ;
Hampel, Heather ;
Kelbick, Nicole ;
Morrison, Carl D. ;
Fowler, Jeffrey M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05) :1208-1215
[5]   Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium [J].
Creasman, William .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2009, 105 (02) :109-109
[6]   Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma:: multicentre randomised trial [J].
Creutzberg, CL ;
van Putten, WLJ ;
Koper, PCM ;
Lybeert, MLM ;
Jobsen, JJ ;
Wárlám-Rodenhuis, CC ;
De Winter, KAJ ;
Lutgens, LCHW ;
van den Bergh, ACM ;
van de Steen-Banasik, E ;
Beerman, H ;
van Lent, M .
LANCET, 2000, 355 (9213) :1404-1411
[7]   L1CAM is an independent predictor Of poor survival in endometrial cancer - An analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) [J].
Dellinger, Thanh H. ;
Smith, David D. ;
Ouyang, Ching ;
Warden, Charles D. ;
Williams, John C. ;
Han, Ernest S. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 141 (02) :336-340
[8]   Loss of ASRGL1 expression is an independent biomarker for disease-specific survival in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma [J].
Edqvist, Per-Henrik D. ;
Huvila, Jutta ;
Forsstrom, Bjorn ;
Talve, Lauri ;
Carpen, Olli ;
Salvesen, Helga B. ;
Krakstad, Camilla ;
Grenman, Seija ;
Johannesson, Henrik ;
Ljungqvist, Oscar ;
Uhlen, Mathias ;
Ponten, Fredrik ;
Auranen, Annika .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 137 (03) :529-537
[9]   Evaluation of vascular space involvement in endometrial adenocarcinomas: laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomies [J].
Folkins, Ann K. ;
Nevadunsky, Nicole S. ;
Saleemuddin, A. ;
Jarboe, Elke A. ;
Muto, Michael G. ;
Feltmate, Colleen M. ;
Crum, Chris P. ;
Hirsch, Michelle S. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 (08) :1073-1079
[10]   Asparaginase-like protein 1 is an independent prognostic marker in primary endometrial cancer, and is frequently lost in metastatic lesions [J].
Fonnes, Tina ;
Berg, Hege F. ;
Bredholt, Therese ;
Edqvist, Per-Henrik D. ;
Sortland, Kristina ;
Berg, Anna ;
Salvesen, Helga B. ;
Akslen, Lars A. ;
Werner, Henrica M. J. ;
Trovik, Jone ;
Tangen, Ingvild L. ;
Krakstad, Camilla .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 148 (01) :197-203