Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking

被引:58
作者
Drew, Trafton [1 ]
Horowitz, Todd S. [1 ]
Vogel, Edward K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Attention; ERPs; Multiple object tracking; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTENTIVE TRACKING; NEURAL MEASURES; PUZZLING FINDINGS; VISUAL TRACKING; WORKING-MEMORY; REPRESENTATIONS; RESOLUTION; TARGETS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the multiple object tracking task, participants are asked to keep targets separate from identical distractors as all items move randomly. It is well known that simple manipulations such as object speed and number of distractors dramatically alter the number of targets that are successfully tracked, but very little is known about what causes this variation in performance. One possibility is that participants tend to lose track of objects (dropping) more frequently under these conditions. Another is that the tendency to confuse a target with a distractor increases (swapping). These two mechanisms have very different implications for the attentional architecture underlying tracking. However, behavioral data alone cannot differentiate between these possibilities. In the current study, we used an electrophysiological marker of the number of items being actively tracked to assess which type of errors tended to occur during speed and distractor load manipulations. Our neural measures suggest that increased distractor load led to an increased likelihood of confusing targets with distractors while increased speed led to an increased chance of a target item being dropped. Behavioral experiments designed to test this novel prediction support this assertion. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Eye movements during multiple object tracking: Where do participants look? [J].
Fehd, Hilda M. ;
Seiffert, Adriane E. .
COGNITION, 2008, 108 (01) :201-209
[12]   Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking [J].
Franconeri, S. L. ;
Lin, J. Y. ;
Pylyshyn, Z. W. ;
Fisher, B. ;
Enns, J. T. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (04) :802-808
[13]   Tracking Multiple Objects Is Limited Only by Object Spacing, Not by Speed, Time, or Capacity [J].
Franconeri, S. L. ;
Jonathan, S. V. ;
Scimeca, J. M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (07) :920-925
[14]   Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object [J].
Holcombe, Alex O. ;
Chen, Wei-Ying .
COGNITION, 2012, 123 (02) :218-228
[15]   Tracking unique objects [J].
Horowitz, Todd S. ;
Klieger, Sarah B. ;
Fencsik, David E. ;
Yang, Kevin K. ;
Alvarez, George A. ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02) :172-184
[16]   How do we track invisible objects? [J].
Horowitz, Todd S. ;
Birnkrant, Randall S. ;
Fencsik, David E. ;
Tran, Linda ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2006, 13 (03) :516-523
[17]   Direction information in multiple object tracking is limited by a graded resource [J].
Horowitz, Todd S. ;
Cohen, Michael A. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2010, 72 (07) :1765-1775
[19]   The spatial resolution of visual attention [J].
Intriligator, J ;
Cavanagh, P .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 43 (03) :171-216
[20]   Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking [J].
Iordanescu, Lucica ;
Grabowecky, Marcia ;
Suzuki, Satoru .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (04)