Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking

被引:58
作者
Drew, Trafton [1 ]
Horowitz, Todd S. [1 ]
Vogel, Edward K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Oregon, Dept Psychol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Attention; ERPs; Multiple object tracking; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ATTENTIVE TRACKING; NEURAL MEASURES; PUZZLING FINDINGS; VISUAL TRACKING; WORKING-MEMORY; REPRESENTATIONS; RESOLUTION; TARGETS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the multiple object tracking task, participants are asked to keep targets separate from identical distractors as all items move randomly. It is well known that simple manipulations such as object speed and number of distractors dramatically alter the number of targets that are successfully tracked, but very little is known about what causes this variation in performance. One possibility is that participants tend to lose track of objects (dropping) more frequently under these conditions. Another is that the tendency to confuse a target with a distractor increases (swapping). These two mechanisms have very different implications for the attentional architecture underlying tracking. However, behavioral data alone cannot differentiate between these possibilities. In the current study, we used an electrophysiological marker of the number of items being actively tracked to assess which type of errors tended to occur during speed and distractor load manipulations. Our neural measures suggest that increased distractor load led to an increased likelihood of confusing targets with distractors while increased speed led to an increased chance of a target item being dropped. Behavioral experiments designed to test this novel prediction support this assertion. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism [J].
Alvarez, George A. ;
Franconeri, Steven L. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2007, 7 (13)
[2]  
[Anonymous], ADV NEURAL INFORM PR
[3]   Close encounters of the distracting kind: Identifying the cause of visual tracking errors [J].
Bae, Gi Yeul ;
Flombaum, Jonathan I. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2012, 74 (04) :703-715
[4]   Effects of target enhancement and distractor suppression on multiple object tracking capacity [J].
Bettencourt, Katherine C. ;
Somers, David C. .
JOURNAL OF VISION, 2009, 9 (07)
[5]   Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention [J].
Cavanagh, P ;
Alvarez, GA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (07) :349-354
[6]   The what-where trade-off in multiple-identity tracking [J].
Cohen, Michael A. ;
Pinto, Yair ;
Howe, Piers D. L. ;
Horowitz, Todd S. .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (05) :1422-1434
[8]   Neural measures of individual differences in selecting and tracking multiple moving objects [J].
Drew, Trafton ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 28 (16) :4183-4191
[9]   Neural Measures of Dynamic Changes in Attentive Tracking Load [J].
Drew, Trafton ;
Horowitz, Todd S. ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (02) :440-450
[10]   Delineating the Neural Signatures of Tracking Spatial Position and Working Memory during Attentive Tracking [J].
Drew, Trafton ;
Horowitz, Todd S. ;
Wolfe, Jeremy M. ;
Vogel, Edward K. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 31 (02) :659-668