Development and validation of the patient-rated ulnar nerve evaluation

被引:47
作者
MacDermid, Joy C. [1 ,2 ]
Grewal, Ruby [1 ]
机构
[1] Hand & Upper Limb Ctr, London, ON N6A 3A8, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
关键词
SELF-ADMINISTERED QUESTIONNAIRE; CUBITAL TUNNEL-SYNDROME; ELBOW; DISABILITY; TRANSPOSITION; COMPRESSION; INSTRUMENTS; NEUROPATHY; PREDICTORS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-14-146
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Compression neuropathy at the elbow causes substantial pain and disability. Clinical research on this disorder is hampered by the lack of a specific outcome measure for this problem. A patient-reported outcome measure, The Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE) was developed to assess pain, symptoms and functional disability in patients with ulnar nerve compression at the elbow. Methods: An iterative process was used to develop and test items. Content validity was addressed using patient/expert interviews and review; linking of the scale items to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes; and cognitive coding of the items. Psychometric analysis of data collected from 89 patients was evaluated. Patients completed a longer version of the PRUNE at baseline. Item reduction was performed using statistical analyses and patient input to obtain the final 20 item version. Score distribution, reliability, exploratory factor analysis, correlational construct validity, discriminative known group construct validity, and responsiveness to change were evaluated. Results: Content analysis indicated items were aligned with subscale concepts of pain and sensory/motor symptoms impairments; specific upper extremity-related tasks; and that the usual function subscale provided a broad view of self-care, household tasks, major life areas and recreation/leisure. Four subscales were demonstrated by factor analysis (pain, sensory/motor symptoms impairments, specific activity limitations, and usual activity/role restrictions). The PRUNE and its subscales had high reliability coefficients (ICCs > 0.90; 0.98 for total score) and low absolute error. The minimal detectable change was 7.1 points. It was able to discriminate between clinically meaningful subgroups determined by an independent evaluation assessing work status, residual symptoms, motor recovery, sensory recovery and global improvement) p < 0.01. Responsiveness was excellent (SRM = 1.55). Conclusion: The PRUNE is a brief, open-access, patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ulnar nerve compression that demonstrates strong measurement properties.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Outcome after colles fracture: The relative responsiveness of three questionnaires and physical examination measures [J].
Amadio, PC ;
Silverstein, MD ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Schleck, CD ;
Jensen, LM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (05) :781-787
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PAT REP OUTC MEAS GR
[3]   Risk factors for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: a case control study [J].
Bartels, R. H. M. A. ;
Verbeek, A. L. M. .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2007, 149 (07) :669-674
[4]   Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature [J].
Bartels, RHMA ;
Menovsky, T ;
Van Overbeeke, JJ ;
Verhagen, WIM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1998, 89 (05) :722-727
[5]  
Beaton DE, 1996, AM J IND MED, V29, P618, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<618::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-F
[7]   A taxonomy for responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Bombardier, C ;
Katz, JN ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (12) :1204-1217
[8]   Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow [J].
Caliandro, Pietro ;
La Torre, Giuseppe ;
Padua, Roberto ;
Giannini, Fabio ;
Padua, Luca .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (02)
[9]  
Cibelli K, COGNITIVE INTERVIEWI
[10]   Icf linking rules:: An update based on lessons learned [J].
Cieza, A ;
Geyh, S ;
Chatterji, S ;
Kostanjsek, N ;
Üstün, B ;
Stucki, G .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2005, 37 (04) :212-218