Is There Phonologically Based Priming in the Same-Different Task? Evidence From Japanese-English Bilinguals

被引:24
作者
Lupker, Stephen J. [1 ]
Nakayama, Mariko [2 ]
Perea, Manuel [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Psychol, London, ON N6A 5C2, Canada
[2] Waseda Univ, Fac Letters Arts & Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Metodol, Fac Psicol, E-46003 Valencia, Spain
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
orthographic code; phonological priming; same-different task; cognate translation equivalents; VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION; ABSTRACT LETTER IDENTITIES; LEXICAL ACCESS; MATCHING-TASK; ORDER INFORMATION; COGNATE STATUS; PRINTED WORD; PERCEPTION; SIMILARITY; ORTHOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1037/xhp0000087
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Norris and colleagues (Kinoshita & Norris, 2009; Norris & Kinoshita, 2008; Norris, Kinoshita, & van Casteren, 2010) have suggested that priming effects in the masked prime same-different task are based solely on prelexical orthographic codes. This suggestion was evaluated by examining phonological priming in that task using Japanese-English bilinguals. Targets and reference words were English words with the primes written in Katakana script, a syllabic script that is orthographically quite different from the Roman letter script used in writing English. Phonological priming was observed both when the primes were Japanese cognate translation equivalents of the English target/reference words (Experiment 1) and when the primes were phonologically similar Katakana nonwords (Experiment 2), with the former effects being substantially larger than the noncognate translation priming effects reported by Lupker, Perea, and Nakayama (2015). These results indicate that the same-different task is influenced by phonological information. One implication is that, due to the fact that phonology and orthography are inevitably confounded in Roman letter languages, previously reported priming effects in those languages may have been at least partly due to phonological, rather than orthographic, similarity. The potential extent of this problem, the nature of the matching process in the same-different task, and the implications for using this task as a means of investigating the orthographic code in reading are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1299
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Letters in Time and Retinotopic Space [J].
Adelman, James S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2011, 118 (04) :570-582
[2]   Cross-linguistic similarity norms for Japanese-English translation equivalents [J].
Allen, David ;
Conklin, Kathy .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (02) :540-563
[3]   Cross-script phonological priming with Japanese Kanji primes and English targets [J].
Ando, Eriko ;
Jared, Debra ;
Nakayama, Mariko ;
Hino, Yasushi .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 26 (08) :853-870
[4]   Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task [J].
Andoni Dunabeitia, Jon ;
Kinoshita, Sachiko ;
Carreiras, Manuel ;
Norris, Dennis .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2011, 26 (4-6) :509-529
[5]   ORDER INFORMATION IN MULTIPLE-ELEMENT COMPARISON [J].
ANGIOLILLOBENT, JS ;
RIPS, LJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1982, 8 (03) :392-406
[6]   BASIC PROCESSES IN READING - COMPUTATION OF ABSTRACT LETTER IDENTITIES [J].
BESNER, D ;
COLTHEART, M ;
DAVELAAR, E .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1984, 38 (01) :126-134
[7]   Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[8]   LETTER AND ORDER INFORMATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS [J].
CHAMBERS, SM .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1979, 18 (02) :225-241
[9]   EVIDENCE FOR LEXICAL ACCESS IN A SIMULTANEOUS MATCHING TASK [J].
CHAMBERS, SM ;
FORSTER, KI .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1975, 3 (05) :549-559
[10]   The Spatial Coding Model of Visual Word Identification [J].
Davis, Cohn J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (03) :713-758