Evolutionary construction by staying together and coming together

被引:80
作者
Tarnita, Corina E. [1 ,2 ]
Taubes, Clifford H. [3 ]
Nowak, Martin A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard Soc Fellows, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Math, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Program Evolutionary Dynam, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Multicellularity; Evolutionary game theory; Complexity; BACTERIAL BIOFILMS; MULTICELLULARITY; COOPERATION; TRANSITION; GAMES; INDIVIDUALITY; ORGANIZATION; COMPLEXITY; NECESSITY; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.022
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The evolutionary trajectory of life on earth is one of increasing size and complexity. Yet the standard equations of evolutionary dynamics describe mutation and selection among similar organisms that compete on the same level of organization. Here we begin to outline a mathematical theory that might help to explore how evolution can be constructive, how natural selection can lead from lower to higher levels of organization. We distinguish two fundamental operations, which we call 'staying together' and 'coming together'. Staying together means that individuals form larger units by not separating after reproduction, while coming together means that independent individuals form aggregates. Staying together can lead to specialization and division of labor, but the developmental program must evolve in the basic unit. Coming together can be creative by combining units with different properties. Both operations have been identified in the context of multicellularity, but they have been treated very similarly. Here we point out that staying together and coming together can be found at every level of biological construction and moreover that they face different evolutionary problems. The distinction is particularly clear in the context of cooperation and defection. For staying together the stability of cooperation takes the form of a developmental error threshold, while coming together leads to evolutionary games and requires a mechanism for the evolution of cooperation. We use our models to discuss simple aspects of the evolution of protocells, eukarya, multi-cellularity and animal societies. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 22
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Alexander R.D., 1974, Annual Rev Ecol Syst, V5, P325, DOI 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2007, EVOLUTION SOCIAL WAS, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195307979.001.0001
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1974, SOCIAL BEHAV BEES CO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1998, EVOLUTIONARY GAMES P
  • [5] Size and complexity among multicellular organisms
    Bell, G
    Mooers, AO
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 1997, 60 (03) : 345 - 363
  • [6] Bonner J. T., 1988, EVOLUTION COMPLEXITY
  • [7] Bonner J.T., 2008, The social amoebae: the biology of cellular slime molds
  • [8] Bonner John Tyler, 1998, Integrative Biology, V1, P27
  • [9] Phagotrophy by a flagellate selects for colonial prey: A possible origin of multicellularity
    Boraas, ME
    Seale, DB
    Boxhorn, JE
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) : 153 - 164
  • [10] Chance and necessity: the evolution of morphological complexity and diversity
    Carroll, SB
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 409 (6823) : 1102 - 1109