Scientific basis for safely shutting in the Macondo Well after the April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout

被引:28
作者
Hickman, Stephen H. [1 ]
Hsieh, Paul A. [2 ]
Mooney, Walter D. [1 ]
Enomoto, Catherine B. [3 ]
Nelson, Philip H. [4 ]
Mayer, Larry A. [5 ]
Weber, Thomas C. [5 ]
Moran, Kathryn [6 ]
Flemings, Peter B. [7 ]
McNutt, Marcia K. [8 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Earthquake Sci Ctr, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Natl Res Program, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Eastern Energy Resources Sci Ctr, Reston, VA 20192 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Cent Energy Resources Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[5] Univ New Hampshire, Ctr Coastal & Ocean Mapping, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[6] Execut Off President, Off Sci & Technol Policy, Washington, DC 20502 USA
[7] Univ Texas Austin, Jackson Sch Geosci, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[8] US Geol Survey, Off Director, Reston, VA 20192 USA
关键词
oil spill; underground blowout; overpressure; reservoir modeling; marine geophysics; GULF-OF-MEXICO; SEA; GAS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1115847109
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As part of the government response to the Deepwater Horizon blowout, a Well Integrity Team evaluated the geologic hazards of shutting in the Macondo Well at the seafloor and determined the conditions under which it could safely be undertaken. Of particular concern was the possibility that, under the anticipated high shut-in pressures, oil could leak out of the well casing below the seafloor. Such a leak could lead to new geologic pathways for hydrocarbon release to the Gulf of Mexico. Evaluating this hazard required analyses of 2D and 3D seismic surveys, seafloor bathymetry, sediment properties, geophysical well logs, and drilling data to assess the geological, hydrological, and geomechanical conditions around the Macondo Well. After the well was successfully capped and shut in on July 15, 2010, a variety of monitoring activities were used to assess subsurface well integrity. These activities included acquisition of wellhead pressure data, marine multichannel seismic profiles, seafloor and water-column sonar surveys, and wellhead visual/acoustic monitoring. These data showed that the Macondo Well was not leaking after shut in, and therefore, it could remain safely shut until reservoir pressures were suppressed (killed) with heavy drilling mud and the well was sealed with cement.
引用
收藏
页码:20268 / 20273
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Adams N, 2006, WORLD OIL, V227, P37
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, USER MANUAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MODFLOW 2000 US GEOL, DOI DOI 10.3133/OFR200092
[4]  
Barree R, 1998, P SPE ANN TECHN C EX
[5]   Dramatic incidents during drilling at Wairakei Geothermal Field, New Zealand [J].
Bolton, Richard S. ;
Hunt, Trevor M. ;
King, Tom R. ;
Thompson, Geoffrey E. K. .
GEOTHERMICS, 2009, 38 (01) :40-47
[6]  
BP, 2010, DEEPW HOR ACC INV RE, P13
[7]   Gas hydrate formation in the deep sea: In situ experiments with controlled release of methane, natural gas, and carbon dioxide [J].
Brewer, PG ;
Orr, FM ;
Friederich, G ;
Kvenvolden, KA ;
Orange, DL .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1998, 12 (01) :183-188
[8]   Sawolo et al. (2009) the Lusi mud volcano controversy: Was it caused by drilling? [J].
Davies, R. ;
Manga, Michael ;
Tingay, Mark ;
Lusianga, Susila ;
Swarbrick, Richard .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) :1651-1657
[9]  
de Pater C, 2009, P SPE HYDR FRACT TEC
[10]  
Department of Epidemiology I, 2010, EHES JOINT ACT PROGR, P31