Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis

被引:105
作者
Bearak, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Burke, Kristen Lagasse [1 ]
Jones, Rachel K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Guttmacher Inst, New York, NY 10038 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; RESTRICTIVE LAW; SERVICE AVAILABILITY; PREGNANCY; TERMINATION; IMPLEMENTATION; CLINICS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Abortion can help women to control their fertility and is an important component of health care for women. Although women in the USA who live further from an abortion clinic are less likely to obtain an abortion than women who live closer to an abortion clinic, no national study has examined inequality in access to abortion and whether inequality has increased as the number of abortion clinics has declined. Methods For this analysis, we obtained data on abortion clinics for 2000, 2011, and 2014 from the Guttmacher Institute's Abortion Provider Census. Block groups and the percentage of women aged 15-44 years by census tract were obtained from the US Census Bureau. Distance to the nearest clinic was calculated for the population-weighted centroid of every block group. We calculated the median distance to an abortion clinic for women in each county and the median and 80th percentile distances for each state by weighting block groups by the number of women of reproductive age (15-44 years). Findings In 2014, women in the USA would have had to travel a median distance of 10.79 miles (17.36 km) to reach the nearest abortion clinic, although 20% of women would have had to travel 42.54 miles (68.46 km) or more. We found substantially greater variation within than between states because, even in mostly rural states, women and clinics were concentrated in urban areas. We identified spatial disparities in abortion access, which were broadly unchanged, at least as far back as 2000. Interpretation We showed substantial and persistent spatial disparities in access to abortion in the USA. These results contribute to an emerging literature documenting similar disparities in other high-income countries. Copyright (c) The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:E493 / E500
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association, 2015, RESTR ACC AB VIOL HU
[2]  
[Anonymous], BACK FUTURE ABORTION
[3]  
[Anonymous], P12 SEX AG 2000 CENS
[4]  
[Anonymous], CTR POP
[5]  
[Anonymous], COUNT POP TOT TABL 2
[6]  
[Anonymous], FAR IS TOO FAR NEW E
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P12 SEX AG 2010 CENS
[8]  
[Anonymous], GEOGR TERMS CONC BLO
[9]  
[Anonymous], URB PERC POP STAT HI
[10]   Did increasing use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa? [J].
Biggs, M. A. ;
Rocca, C. H. ;
Brindis, C. D. ;
Hirsch, H. ;
Grossman, D. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 91 (02) :167-173