Extent of mesorectal tumor invasion as a prognostic factor after curative surgery for T3 rectal cancer patients

被引:63
作者
Miyoshi, M [1 ]
Ueno, H
Hashiguchi, Y
Mochizuki, H
Talbot, IC
机构
[1] Natl Def Med Coll, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359, Japan
[2] St Marks Hosp Acad Inst, Harrow, Middx, England
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.sla.0000205627.05769.08
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the significance of the extent of mesorectal tumor invasion as a prognostic factor for T3 rectal cancer patients. Summary Background Data: There is controversy as to which primary lesion characteristics, other than regional lymph node involvement, in T3 rectal cancer are reliable prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: The extent of mesorectal tumor invasion was evaluated using 2 data sets comprising 196 and 247 patients undergoing curative surgery at separate institutes. When the outer aspect of the muscular layer was not identifiable, an estimate was obtained by drawing a straight line between the 2 break points of the muscular layer. Results: We selected 6 mm as the optimal value for subclassification of T3 rectal patients into 2 groups, based on the extent of mesorectal invasion, using the first data set. The overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with < 6 mm than in those with >= 6 mm of mesorectal invasion (72% versus 50%; P < 0.01). Similarly, in the second data set, the overall 5-year survival rates of patients with mesorectal invasion < 6 min and >= 6 mm were 59% and 37%, respectively (P < 0.01). In both data sets, multivariate analyses verified the extent of mesorectal invasion to be an independent prognostic factor, together with nodal involvement. Regarding positive nodal involvement and mesorectal invasion >= 6 mm as risk factors, the overall 5-year survival rates with none, one, and both of these factors were 84%, 61%, and 38%, respectively, in the first data set (P < 0.01). Prognostic results were similar for the second data set. Conclusion: Extent of mesorectal invasion, based on a 6-mm cutoff value, is useful for subclassification of T3 rectal cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:492 / 498
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   EXTENT OF MESORECTAL SPREAD AND INVOLVEMENT OF LATERAL RESECTION MARGIN AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AFTER SURGERY FOR RECTAL-CANCER [J].
CAWTHORN, SJ ;
PARUMS, DV ;
GIBBS, NM ;
AHERN, RP ;
CAFFAREY, SM ;
BROUGHTON, CIM ;
MARKS, CG .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8697) :1055-1059
[3]   Molecular prognostic markers and colorectal cancer: The search goes on [J].
Chung, DC .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (06) :1330-1332
[4]  
Compton Carolyn C, 2002, Clin Colorectal Cancer, V2, P149, DOI 10.3816/CCC.2002.n.020
[5]   Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer [J].
Dexter, SPL ;
Sue-Ling, H ;
McMahon, MJ ;
Quirke, P ;
Mapstone, N ;
Martin, IG .
GUT, 2001, 48 (05) :667-670
[6]   Comparison of microsatellite instability and chromosomal instability in predicting survival of patients with T3N0 colorectal cancer [J].
Gervaz, P ;
Cerottini, JP ;
Bouzourene, H ;
Hahnloser, D ;
Doan, CL ;
Benhattar, J ;
Chaubert, P ;
Secic, M ;
Gillet, M ;
Carethers, JM .
SURGERY, 2002, 131 (02) :190-197
[7]  
Greene FL., 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD, V6th
[8]   Circumferential margin involvement after mesorectal excision of rectal cancer with curative intent - Predictor of survival but not local recurrence? [J].
Hall, NR ;
Finan, PJ ;
Al-Jaberi, T ;
Tsang, CS ;
Brown, SR ;
Dixon, MF ;
Quirke, P .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (08) :979-983
[9]  
HALL WH, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V264, P1444
[10]   GENETIC DIAGNOSIS OF LYMPH-NODE METASTASIS IN COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
HAYASHI, N ;
ITO, I ;
YANAGISAWA, A ;
KATO, Y ;
NAKAMORI, S ;
IMAOKA, S ;
WATANABE, H ;
OGAWA, M ;
NAKAMURA, Y .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8960) :1257-1259