Current issues in PhD supervision of accounting and finance students: Evidence from Australia and New Zealand

被引:17
作者
Khosa, Amrinder [1 ]
Burch, Steven [1 ]
Ozdil, Esin [2 ]
Wilkin, Carla [3 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Level 7,271 Collins St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, 1 Kingsbury Dr, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Accounting, 900 Dandenong Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3145, Australia
关键词
Performance standards; PhD supervision; Accounting and finance; Supervision models; Supervisory styles; Structure and support; DOCTORAL EDUCATION; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; CANDIDATES; TENSIONS; ACADEMY; POLICY; FUTURE; POWER; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2019.100874
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper reports on the current trends in accounting and finance PhD supervision in Australia and New Zealand. By examining the various supervision styles adopted by students and supervisors, we identified various tensions, including the influence of performance outcomes that may hinder the vibrant spirit of inquiry that should be intrinsic to the PhD journey and to future academia. Our findings demonstrated both supervisor and student preference for more structured (contractual or directorial) styles of supervision. Changes consistent with this preference include group supervision, the closer alignment of student research topics with supervisor interests, and the preference for certain research paradigms and a focus on journal publications. While students and supervisors regard these changes as key elements in addressing the performance demands associated with PhD outcomes, they present challenges for attaining a balance between product (thesis/ contribution to knowledge) and process (students' journeys towards scholarship), together with supervisors' roles therein. (c) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Supervising doctoral students: variation in purpose and pedagogy [J].
Akerlind, Gerlese ;
McAlpine, Lynn .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (09) :1686-1698
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HIGHER ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, The pedagogy of 'good' PhD supervision: A national cross-disciplinary investigation of PhD supervision
[5]  
Baker M., 1997, AUSTR POSTGRADUATE R
[6]   Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance [J].
Barry, K. M. ;
Woods, M. ;
Warnecke, E. ;
Stirling, C. ;
Martin, A. .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (03) :468-483
[7]   Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature [J].
Bastalich, Wendy .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (07) :1145-1157
[8]  
Beattie V., 2012, TODAYS PHD STUDENTSD
[9]   Supervisory styles: a contingency framework [J].
Boehe, Dirk Michael .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (03) :399-414
[10]  
Boston J., 2005, SOC POLICY J N Z, V24, P55