The Performance of Supply-Push Versus Demand-Pull Technology Transfer and the Role of Technology Marketing Strategies: The Case of a Korean Public Research Institute

被引:8
作者
Choe, Won Jun [1 ]
Ji, Ilyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ Technol & Educ, Dept IT Convergence & Management, Cheonan 31253, South Korea
关键词
technology transfer; supply-push; demand pull; technology marketing; mass marketing; target marketing; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.3390/su11072005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Technology transfer is one of important strategies in sustainable economic growth. There are supply-push and demand-pull directions of technology transfer, and recently Korean research institutes have paid increasing attention to demand-pull technology transfer in an attempt to improve public research institutes' technology transfer performance (TTP). However, our view is that simply adopting a demand-pull or a supply-push model does not always guarantee improved TTP. We argue that technology marketing strategies, such as mass marketing and target marketing, should also be considered. This study aims to investigate the relationship between technology transfer directions and TTP, and the role of technology marketing strategies. We collected a Korean research institute's technology transfer data from 2014 to 2015, and then employed a two-way ANOVA to analyze the data. The result of the analysis shows that TTPs differ by technology transfer directions and technology marketing strategies. More importantly, we found that the demand-pull model yields higher TTP, especially when the model is associated with target marketing strategies rather than mass-marketing strategies. This result implies that marketing strategies, such as market segmentation and customer targeting, are needed if an organization wants to improve TTP by implementing the demand-pull technology transfer model.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1972, The Future of Nature: Documents of Global Change
[2]   Markets for university inventions: the role of patents' underlying knowledge in university-to-industry technology commercialisation [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 78 (1-2) :9-27
[3]   Organizing for continuous technology acquisition: the role of R&D geographic dispersion [J].
Ardito, Lorenzo ;
Natalicchio, Angelo ;
Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni ;
Garavelli, Achille Claudio .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2018, 48 (02) :165-176
[4]  
AUTIO E, 1995, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V10, P643
[5]   Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review [J].
Battistella, Cinzia ;
De Toni, Alberto F. ;
Pillon, Roberto .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2016, 41 (05) :1195-1234
[6]  
Bauer S.M., 2003, J TECHNOL TRANSFER, V28, P285, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1024953130221
[7]  
Bauer StephenM., 2010, Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, V6, P129
[8]   Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory [J].
Bozeman, B .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (4-5) :627-655
[9]  
Bum Chung Do, 2013, [JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 기술혁신연구], V21, P199
[10]  
Carr R K., 1992, The Journal of Technology Transfer, V17, P8, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02199474