Application-oriented quantum computing benchmark for an electromobility use case

被引:2
作者
Federer, Marika [1 ]
Muessig, Daniel [2 ]
Klaiber, Stefan [1 ]
Lenk, Steve [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer IOSB AST, Dept Cognit Energy Syst, Ilmenau, Germany
[2] Fraunhofer IOSB AST, Dept Cognit Energy Syst, Gorlitz, Germany
来源
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTUM COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING (QCE 2022) | 2022年
关键词
Charging Scheduling Optimization; Quantum Computing; Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm QAOA; Battery electric vehicles BEV; Combinatorial Optimization; real-world application;
D O I
10.1109/QCE53715.2022.00105
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
The reduction of CO2 emissions is one of the major challenges in the current century. A game-changer might be quantum computing due to the proposed capabilities. A key field of interest for reducing CO2 emissions is the energy sector being transformed from fossil-based to be based on renewable energies and simultaneously combining electricity, heating, mobility, and manufacturing industries. Here, we study an use case for optimal charging scheduling of battery-electric service vehicles considering the requirements of their tasks, local solar power generation, and their battery capabilities to minimize power grid usage and so CO2 emissions from fossil-based electricity generation. The study compares benchmark results obtained classically with results obtained by the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) to show the current capability of gate-based quantum optimization for a real-world use case. We present different formulations of the optimization problem and specific considerations for our use case necessary to yield optimal solutions reproducible with IBM's gate-based quantum computers. Here, we used Qiskit's built-in QAOA method but also self-made methods to examine the influence of the complexity of the problem formulation (penalty factors, landscape of cost function, etc.) as well as the dependence on parameters of the QAOA method (classical optimizer, result extraction, etc.). To obtain reliable results, we used different physical backends and simulations. Finally, we summarize or results and address future improvements for the used QAOA approach for automated real-world applications.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 752
页数:4
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Quantum advantage with shallow circuits
    Bravyi, Sergey
    Gosset, David
    Koenig, Robert
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2018, 362 (6412) : 308 - +
  • [2] Deller Yannick, 2022, Quantum approximate optimization algorithm for qudit systems with long-range interactions
  • [3] Farhi E, 2014, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1411.4028
  • [4] Kustner M., 2021, THESIS TU ILMENAU
  • [5] Ising formulations of many NP problems
    Lucas, Andrew
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2014, 2 : 1 - 14
  • [6] Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware
    Schuld, Maria
    Bergholm, Ville
    Gogolin, Christian
    Izaac, Josh
    Killoran, Nathan
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (03)