Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species

被引:1323
作者
Losos, Jonathan B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Museum Comparat Zool, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Organism & Evolutionary Biol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
phylogenetic effect; phylogenetic niche conservatism; phylogenetic signal;
D O I
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01229.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecologists are increasingly adopting an evolutionary perspective, and in recent years, the idea that closely related species are ecologically similar has become widespread. In this regard, phylogenetic signal must be distinguished from phylogenetic niche conservatism. Phylogenetic niche conservatism results when closely related species are more ecologically similar that would be expected based on their phylogenetic relationships; its occurrence suggests that some process is constraining divergence among closely related species. In contrast, phylogenetic signal refers to the situation in which ecological similarity between species is related to phylogenetic relatedness; this is the expected outcome of Brownian motion divergence and thus is necessary, but not sufficient, evidence for the existence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Although many workers consider phylogenetic niche conservatism to be common, a review of case studies indicates that ecological and phylogenetic similarities often are not related. Consequently, ecologists should not assume that phylogenetic niche conservatism exists, but rather should empirically examine the extent to which it occurs.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1003
页数:9
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Ackerly DD, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, pS50, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[50:NEAART]2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   Community assembly, niche conservatism, and adaptive evolution in changing environments [J].
Ackerly, DD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 2003, 164 (03) :S165-S184
[4]   Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: Comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral [J].
Ackerly, DD .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 163 (05) :654-671
[5]   The relationship of phylogeny to community structure: The cactus yeast community [J].
Anderson, TM ;
Lachance, MA ;
Starmer, WT .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 164 (06) :709-721
[6]  
[Anonymous], PHYLOGENETICS ECOLOG
[7]   Are 'comparative methods' always necessary? [J].
Bjorklund, M .
OIKOS, 1997, 80 (03) :607-612
[8]   Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile [J].
Blomberg, SP ;
Garland, T ;
Ives, AR .
EVOLUTION, 2003, 57 (04) :717-745
[9]   Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods [J].
Blomberg, SP ;
Garland, T .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2002, 15 (06) :899-910
[10]   Weak phylogenetic effects on ecological niches of Sylvia warblers [J].
Böhning-Gaese, K ;
Schuda, MD ;
Helbig, AJ .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2003, 16 (05) :956-965