Personality and Affinities Play a Key Role in the Organisation of Collective Movements in a Group of Domestic Horses

被引:49
作者
Briard, Lea [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dorn, Camille [4 ]
Petit, Odile [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, CNRS, Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
[3] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Serv Ecol Sociale, Brussels, Belgium
[4] EthoLogic, Charnay, France
关键词
decision-making; equids; hierarchy; leadership; social network; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS; GRAZING BEHAVIOR; GROUP DEPARTURES; BARNACLE GEESE; SORRAIA HORSES; GROUP MEMBERS; GROUP-SIZE; TEMPERAMENT; DOMINANCE;
D O I
10.1111/eth.12402
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Understanding how groups of individuals with different motives come to daily decisions about the exploitation of their environment is a key question in animal behaviour. While interindividual differences are often seen only as a threat to group cohesion, growing evidence shows that they may to some extent facilitate effective collective action. Recent studies suggest that personality differences influence how individuals are attracted to conspecifics and affect their behaviour as an initiator or a follower. However, most of the existing studies are limited to a few taxa, mainly social fish and arthropods. Horses are social herbivores that live in long-lasting groups and show identifiable personality differences between individuals. We studied a group of 38 individuals living in a 30-ha hilly pasture. Over 200h, we sought to identify how far individual differences such as personality and affinity distribution affect the dynamic of their collective movements. First, we report that individuals distribute their relationships according to similar personality and hierarchical rank. This is the first study that demonstrates a positive assortment between unrelated individuals according to personality in a mammal species. Second, we measured individual propensity to initiate and found that bold individuals initiated more often than shy individuals. However, their success in terms of number of followers and joining duration did not depend on their individual characteristics. Moreover, joining process is influenced by social network, with preferred partners following each other and bolder individuals being located more often at the front of the movement. Our results illustrate the importance of taking into account interindividual behavioural differences in studies of social behaviours.
引用
收藏
页码:888 / 902
页数:15
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF BEHAVIOR - SAMPLING METHODS
    ALTMANN, J
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR, 1974, 49 (3-4) : 227 - 267
  • [2] Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major)
    Aplin, L. M.
    Farine, D. R.
    Morand-Ferron, J.
    Cole, E. F.
    Cockburn, A.
    Sheldon, B. C.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2013, 16 (11) : 1365 - 1372
  • [3] Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds
    Aplin, Lucy M.
    Farine, Damien R.
    Mann, Richard P.
    Sheldon, Ben C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1789)
  • [4] COMPETITION IN A RED DEER STAG SOCIAL GROUP - RANK, AGE AND RELATEDNESS OF OPPONENTS
    APPLEBY, MC
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1983, 31 (AUG) : 913 - 918
  • [5] Barto K, 2014, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF
  • [6] Bastian M., 2009, P INT AAAI C WEBL SO, V3, P361, DOI [DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V3I1.13937, 10.13140/2.1.1341.1520]
  • [7] Bates D., 2007, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF
  • [8] ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS AND DOMINANCE IN FERAL HORSES IN GRAND CANYON
    BERGER, J
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1977, 2 (02) : 131 - 146
  • [9] Animal personality due to social niche specialisation
    Bergmueller, Ralph
    Taborsky, Michael
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (09) : 504 - 511
  • [10] Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers
    Boissy, A
    Dumont, B
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (03) : 233 - 245