Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients

被引:94
作者
Peterseim, DS
Cen, YY
Cheruvu, S
Landolfo, K
Bashore, TM
Lowe, JE
Wolfe, WG
Glower, DD
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70368-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to optimize selection criteria of biologic versus mechanical valve prostheses for aortic valve replacement. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed for 841 patients undergoing isolated, first-time aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards (n = 429) or St Jude Medical (n = 412) prostheses. Results: Patients with Carpentier-Edwards and St Jude Medical valves had similar characteristics. Ten-gear survival was similar in each group (Carpentier-Edwards 54% +/- 3% versus St Jude Medical 50% +/- 6%; P =.4), Independent predictors of worse survival were older age, renal or lung disease, ejection fraction less than 40%, diabetes, and coronary disease. Carpentier-Edwards versus St Jude Medical prostheses did not affect survival (P =.4). Independent predictors of aortic valve reoperation were younger age and Carpentier-Edwards prosthesis. The linearized rates of thromboembolism were similar, but the linearized rate of hemorrhage was lower with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses (P <.01), Perivalvular leak within 6 months of operation was more likely with St Jude Medical than with Carpentier-Edwards prostheses (P =.02). Estimated 10-year survival free from valve-related morbidity was better for the St Jude Medical valve in patients aged less than 65 Sears and was better for the Carpentier-Edwards valve in patients aged more than 65 years. Patients with renal disease, lung disease tin patients more than age 60 years), ejection fraction less than 40%, or coronary disease had a life expectancy of less than 10 years. Conclusions: For first-time, isolated aortic valve replacement, mechanical prostheses should be consider ed in patients under age 65 years with a life expectancy of at least 10 years. Bioprostheses should be considered in patients over age 65 years or with lung disease tin patients over age 60 Sears), renal disease, coronary disease, ejection fraction less than 40%, or a life expectancy less than 10 years.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 897
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term Fate of Dilated Ascending Aorta after Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Disease
    Kim, Min-Seok
    Kim, Jung Hwan
    Lee, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Sak
    Youn, Young-Nam
    Yoo, Kyung-Jong
    Joo, Hyun-Chel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 129 : 53 - 59
  • [42] Long-Term Outcomes and Echocardiographic Data After Aortic Valve Replacement With a 17-mm Mechanical Valve
    Okamura, Homare
    Hori, Daijiro
    Kusadokoro, Sho
    Mieno, Makiko
    Kimura, Naoyuki
    Yuri, Koichi
    Yamaguchi, Atsushi
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2020, 84 (12) : 2312 - 2319
  • [43] Long-term follow-up of morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve prosthesis
    Kvidal, P
    Bergström, R
    Malm, T
    Ståhle, E
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (13) : 1099 - 1111
  • [44] Long-Term Outcome with New Generation Prostheses in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Tamm, Alexander R.
    Geyer, Martin
    Kreidel, Felix
    Dausmann, Lea
    Jablonski, Caroline
    Hahad, Omar
    Schulz, Eberhard
    Muenzel, Thomas
    Von Bardeleben, Ralph Stephan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (14)
  • [45] Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic root replacement
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Brown, James A.
    Ridgley, Jacqueline
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Navid, Forozan
    Wang, Yisi
    Thoma, Floyd W.
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (07) : 1861 - 1867
  • [46] LONG-TERM RESULTS OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
    FLEMING, J
    HAMER, J
    HAYWARD, G
    HILL, I
    TUBBS, OS
    BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1969, 31 (03): : 388 - &
  • [47] Propensity matched long-term analysis of mechanical versus stentless aortic valve replacement in the younger patient
    Christ, Torsten
    Borck, Robin
    Dushe, Simon
    Suendermann, Simon Harald
    Falk, Volkmar
    Grubitzsch, Herko
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 60 (02) : 276 - 283
  • [48] AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT - LONG-TERM RESULTS
    BLOODWEL.RD
    OKIES, JE
    HALLMAN, GL
    COOLEY, DA
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1969, 58 (04) : 457 - &
  • [49] Impact of Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Long-Term Survival in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve
    De Felice, Francesco
    Paolucci, Luca
    Cesario, Vincenzo
    Musto, Carmine
    Nazzaro, Marco Stefano
    Chin, Diana
    Stio, Rocco
    Pennacchi, Mauro
    Gabrielli, Domenico
    Fiorina, Claudia
    Massussi, Mauro
    Angelillis, Marco
    Costa, Giulia
    Bruschi, Giuseppe
    Fineschi, Massimo
    Maffeo, Diego
    Barletta, Marta
    Regazzoli, Damiano
    Montorfano, Matteo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 210 : 146 - 152
  • [50] The First Two Cases of Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Quadricuspid Aortic Valve
    Zhou, Dao
    Fan, Jiaqi
    Liu, Xianbao
    Wang, Jian'an
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (10) : E839 - E840