What do faculty observe of medical students' clinical performance?

被引:50
作者
Pulito, AR [1 ]
Donnelly, MB [1 ]
Plymale, M [1 ]
Mentzer, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15328015tlm1802_2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: An earlier study of our faculty's evaluation of junior medical students indicated that performance ratings were unreliable and reflected 1 underlying dimension. Other researchers have obtained similar results. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify which aspects of students' clinical performance faculty actually observe. Methods: We analyzed the responses of faculty members to an open-ended questionnaire concerning which aspects of clinical performance attending faculty observe. We also reviewed and summarized the written comments of 331 faculty evaluations of third-year medical students. Results: Analysis of the questionnaires and evaluations indicated that faculty members gauge medical knowledge, professionalism, and clinical reasoning skills from direct interaction with students. History taking and physical examination skills are inferred from the quality of verbal presentations. Faculty have little basis for evaluating other important aspects of clinical performance. Conclusions: Faculty primarily observe medical students cognitive skills and professionalism. Faculty have little basis for evaluating most other features of clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Assessment of a surgery clerkship's performance evaluation system [J].
DaRosa, DA ;
Niehaus, AH ;
Markwell, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (02) :145-149
[2]   Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data [J].
Downing, SM .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2003, 37 (09) :830-837
[3]  
ERVITI V, 1979, P 18 ANN C RES MED E, P185
[4]   Toward meaningful evaluation of clinical competence: The rote of direct observation in clerkship ratings [J].
Hasnain, M ;
Connell, KJ ;
Downing, SM ;
Olthoff, A ;
Yudkowsky, R .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) :S21-S24
[5]   HOW ACCURATE ARE FACULTY EVALUATIONS OF CLINICAL COMPETENCE [J].
HERBERS, JE ;
NOEL, GL ;
COOPER, GS ;
PANGARO, LN ;
WEAVER, MJ ;
HARVEY, J .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 4 (03) :202-208
[6]   Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school [J].
Kassebaum, DG ;
Eaglen, RH .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (07) :842-849
[7]   A generalizability study of a new standardized rating form used to evaluate students' clinical clerkship performances [J].
Kreiter, CD ;
Ferguson, K ;
Lee, WC ;
Brennan, RL ;
Densen, P .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1998, 73 (12) :1294-1298
[8]   DIMENSIONALITY, INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE RATINGS [J].
MAXIM, BR ;
DIELMAN, TE .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1987, 21 (02) :130-137
[9]   Faculty evaluation of surgery clerkship students: Important components of written comments [J].
Plymale, MA ;
Donnelly, MB ;
Lawton, J ;
Pulito, AR ;
Mentzer, RM .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2002, 77 (10) :S45-S47
[10]   FACULTY SENSITIVITY IN DETECTING MEDICAL-STUDENTS CLINICAL COMPETENCE [J].
SLOAN, DA ;
DONNELLY, MB ;
DRAKE, DB ;
SCHWARTZ, RW .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 1995, 17 (03) :335-342