Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system:: results of a multi-centre investigation

被引:113
作者
Gstoettner, Wolfgang K. [1 ]
De Heyning, Paul Van [2 ]
O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald [3 ]
Morera, Constantino [4 ]
Sainz, Manuel [5 ]
Vermeire, Katrien [2 ]
McDonald, Sonelle [3 ]
Cavalle, Laura [4 ]
Helbig, Silke [1 ]
Valdecasas, Juan Garcia [5 ]
Anderson, Ilona [6 ,7 ]
Adunka, Oliver F. [8 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Ziekenhuis, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] St Thomas Hosp, London, England
[4] Univ La Fe, Valencia, Spain
[5] Univ San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
[6] MED EL, Dept Clin Res, Innsbruck, Austria
[7] Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[8] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
electric acoustic stimulation; hearing preservation; high frequency hearing loss; cochlear implant;
D O I
10.1080/00016480701805471
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusion. A high rate of hearing preservation during cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) is possible, even when surgery is conducted by a number of different surgeons. Objectives. This study aimed to determine the degree of hearing preservation using surgery for EAS in a European multi-centre clinical investigation. It also aimed to demonstrate the effect of EAS in individuals with residual low frequency hearing, both on speech perception and on subjective quality of life measures. Patients and methods. Eighteen patients with profound high frequency hearing loss were recruited in five participating European centres. Subjects were assessed based on an audiologic test battery, as well as on a subjective hearing aid benefit questionnaire. Each subject underwent attempted hearing preservation cochlear implantation using the MED-EL C40+ device with a Medium electrode. Residual ipsilateral hearing and speech discrimination abilities were assessed at defined intervals up to 12 months after the combined electric-acoustic mode was introduced. Results. Results showed that some degree of hearing preservation was possible in 15718 patients. All subjects showed statistically significant benefit on all three speech perception tests over time. These significant benefits were also reflected in the subjective benefit outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:968 / 975
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Adunka O, 2005, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V131, P488, DOI 10.1001/archotol.131.6.488
[2]   THE ABBREVIATED PROFILE OF HEARING-AID BENEFIT [J].
COX, RM ;
ALEXANDER, GC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (02) :176-186
[3]  
DORMAN MF, 2003, ENG MED BIOL, P1999
[4]   Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant [J].
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Macias, Angel Ramos ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Burdo, Sandro ;
Ramsden, Richard ;
Deguine, Olivier ;
Klenzner, Thomas ;
Lenarz, Thomas ;
Rodriguez, Manuel Manrique ;
Von Wallenberg, Ernst ;
James, Chris .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) :624-633
[5]   Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing [J].
Gantz, BJ ;
Turner, C ;
Gfeller, KE ;
Lowder, MW .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (05) :796-802
[6]  
Gantz Bruce J, 2004, Cochlear Implants Int, V5 Suppl 1, P8, DOI 10.1179/cim.2004.5.Supplement-1.8
[7]   Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation [J].
Gstoettner, W ;
Kiefer, J ;
Baumgartner, WD ;
Pok, S ;
Peters, S ;
Adunka, O .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2004, 124 (04) :348-352
[8]  
Gstoettner Wolfgang K, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P49, DOI 10.1159/000095614
[9]  
Hodges A, 1997, AM J OTOL, V18, P179
[10]   Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation:: How and why [J].
James, C ;
Albegger, K ;
Battmer, R ;
Burdo, S ;
Deggouj, N ;
Deguine, O ;
Dillier, N ;
Gersdorff, M ;
Laszig, R ;
Lenarz, T ;
Rodriguez, MM ;
Mondain, M ;
Offeciers, E ;
Macías, AR ;
Ramsden, R ;
Sterkers, O ;
Von Wallenberg, E ;
Weber, B ;
Fraysse, B .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2005, 125 (05) :481-491