Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes and chronic kidney disease

被引:33
|
作者
Wang, Heyang [1 ]
Qi, Jing [1 ]
Li, Yi [1 ]
Tang, Yunbiao [1 ]
Li, Chao [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Han, Yaling [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Hosp Shenyang Mil Reg, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
chronic kidney disease; non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes; pharmacodynamics; ticagrelor; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; CHRONIC-RENAL-FAILURE; ARTERY-DISEASE; CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS; PLATELET INHIBITION; CHINESE PATIENTS; IMPACT; OUTCOMES; TRIAL; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.13436
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BackgroundPivotal clinical trials found that ticagrelor reduced ischaemic complications to a greater extent than clopidogrel, and also that the benefit gradually increased with the reduction in creatinine clearance. However, the underlying mechanisms remains poorly explored. MethodsThis was a single-centre, prospective, randomized clinical trial involving 60 hospitalized Adenosine Diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor inhibitor-naive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60ml min(-1) 1.73m(-2)) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ticagrelor (180mg loading dose, then followed by 90mg twice daily) or clopidogrel (600mg loading dose, then followed by 75mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the P2Y12 reactive unit (PRU) value assessed by VerifyNow at 30days. The plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and clopidogrel and their active metabolites were measured in the first 10 patients in each group at baseline, and at 1h, 2h, 4h, 8h, 12h and 24h after the loading dose. ResultsBaseline characteristics were well matched between the two groups. Our results indicated a markedly lower PRU in patients treated with ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel at 30days (32.6 11.29 vs. 203.7 +/- 17.92; P < 0.001) as well as at 2h, 8h and 24h after the loading dose (P < 0.001). Ticagrelor and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX showed a similar time to reach maximum concentration (C-max) of 8h, with the maximum concentration (C-max) of 355 (242.50-522.00) ng ml(-1)and 63.20 (50.80-85.15) ng ml(-1), respectively. Both clopidogrel and its active metabolite approached the C-max at 2h, with a similar C-max of 8.67 (6.64-27.75) ng ml(-1)vs. 8.53 (6.94-15.93) ng ml(-1). ConclusionTicagrelor showed much more potent platelet inhibition in comparison with clopidogrel in patients with CKD and NSTE-ACS.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 96
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor when treating non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Monitillo, Francesco
    Iacoviello, Massimo
    Caldarola, Pasquale
    Valle, Roberto
    Chiatto, Mario
    Aspromonte, Nadia
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 11 (06) : 977 - 993
  • [22] TicagRelor Or Clopidogrel in severe or terminal chronic kidney patients Undergoing PERcutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: The TROUPER trial
    Laine, Marc
    Lemesle, Gilles
    Burtey, Stephane
    Cayla, Guillaume
    Range, Gregoire
    Quaino, Gonzalo
    Canault, Matthias
    Pankert, Mathieu
    Paganelli, Franck
    Puymirat, Etienne
    Bonello, Laurent
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 225 : 19 - 26
  • [23] Ticagrelor or Aspirin After Coronary Artery Bypass in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
    Sandner, Sigrid E.
    Schunkert, Heribert
    Kastrati, Adnan
    Milojevic, Milan
    Boning, Andreas
    Zimpfer, Daniel
    Zellmer, Stephan
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Laufer, Gunther
    von Scheidt, Moritz
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 113 (02) : 554 - 562
  • [24] Platelet Inhibition with Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Diabetic Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Syndromes
    Liu, Zhenyu
    Tian, Ran
    Wang, Yang
    Chen, Qian
    Li, Jingyi
    Xu, Lihong
    Zhang, Shuyang
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2020, 120 (08) : 1221 - 1229
  • [25] Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of ticagrelor in Asian patients with stable coronary artery disease
    Hiasa Y.
    Teng R.
    Emanuelsson H.
    Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, 2014, 29 (4) : 324 - 333
  • [26] Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in East-Asian patients with acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Wu, Bin
    Lin, Houwen
    Tobe, Ruoyan Gai
    Zhang, Le
    He, Ben
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (03) : 281 - 291
  • [27] Alternatives to clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes: Prasugrel or ticagrelor?
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Lotrionte, Marzia
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 2 (06): : 131 - 134
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Li, Jianan
    Qiu, Hong
    Yan, Lirong
    Guo, Tingting
    Wang, Yong
    Li, Yang
    Zheng, Jianfeng
    Tang, Yida
    Xu, Bo
    Qiao, Shubin
    Yang, Yuejin
    Gao, Runlin
    JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2021, 28 (08) : 873 - 882
  • [29] Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Franczyk-Skora, Beata
    Gluba, Anna
    Banach, Maciej
    Rozentryt, Piotr
    Polonski, Lech
    Rysz, Jacek
    CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 11 (05) : 758 - 767
  • [30] Optimal strategy of switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in Chinese acute coronary syndrome patients with complicated coronary artery disease: the switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor (SHIFT-CACS) study
    Yao, Ying
    Wang, Ping
    Wang, Xiao-Zeng
    Zhao, Xin
    Zhao, Wei
    Zhou, Tie-Nan
    Zhang, Lei
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 132 (19) : 2292 - 2299