Crossed Leg Sign Is Associated With Severity of Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke

被引:3
作者
Luvizutto, Gustavo Jose [1 ]
de Moura Neto, Eduardo [2 ]
de Lima Resende, Luiz Antonio [3 ]
de Carvalho Nunes, Helio Rubens [4 ]
Gomes Garcia Betting, Luiz Eduardo [3 ]
Bazan, Rodrigo [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Triangulo Mineiro UFTM, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Appl Phys Therapy, Uberaba, Brazil
[2] Fac Human Talent FACTHUS, Dept Phys Therapy, Uberaba, Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Botucatu Sch Med, Dept Neurol Psychol & Psychiat, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Botucatu Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
crossed leg sign; unilateral spatial neglect; hemispatial neglect; stroke; cerebrovascular disease; REPRESENTATION; PARIETAL; CORTEX;
D O I
10.3389/fneur.2018.00256
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The crossed leg sign in patients with right hemisphere stroke is thought to be associated with perceptual disorders, such as unilateral spatial neglect (USN). The aim of this study was to compare the crossed leg sign with the severity of USN during the acute phase of stroke. Experimental procedures: This was an observational and prospective clinical study of individuals with a diagnosis of right parietal stroke, as confirmed by neuroimaging. The occurrence of the crossed leg sign, the time at which this occurred after the stroke, and a clinical diagnosis of USN were measured and recorded. The patients' age, sex, and lesion severity, as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Glasgow coma scale, were included in the analyses as confounding variables. The outcome of interest was the degree of USN, as measured by the cancellation and bisection tests. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of crossed leg syndrome on the severity of USN. In the adjusted multiple regression model, a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall, 60 patients were included in this study. There were no associations between patient demographics and the presence of the crossed leg sign. There was, however, an association between the crossed leg sign and the absolute value of the deviation in the line bisection test (B = -0.234; p = 0.039). The crossed leg sign was not associated with other measures of USN. Conclusion: Based on the results of our study, we can conclude that a crossed leg sign in the acute phase of stroke is associated with USN severity, specifically the misinterpretation of the midline.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   SIMPLE TEST OF VISUAL NEGLECT [J].
ALBERT, ML .
NEUROLOGY, 1973, 23 (06) :658-664
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1914, SEMEIOLOGIE AFFECTIO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1865, GAZ HEBD MED CHIR
[4]   A new clinical sign probably associated to left hemiplegia with left hemineglect syndrome: the crossed legs [J].
Bazan, Rodrigo ;
Fernandes, Thiago ;
Braga, Gabriel ;
Luvizutto, Gustavo ;
Resende, Luiz .
ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2014, 72 (06) :418-421
[5]   Neuroimaging of eye position reveals spatial neglect [J].
Becker, Elisabeth ;
Karnath, Hans-Otto .
BRAIN, 2010, 133 :909-914
[6]   Deviation of eyes and head in acute cerebral stroke [J].
Berger, M. Fruhmann ;
Pross, R. D. ;
Ilg, U. J. ;
Karnath, H-O .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2006, 6 (1)
[7]   ACTION OF BRIEF POLARIZING CURRENTS ON CEREBRAL CORTEX OF RAT .1. DURING CURRENT FLOW + .2. IN PRODUCTION OF LONG-LECTING AFTER-EFFECTS [J].
BINDMAN, LJ ;
LIPPOLD, OCJ ;
REDFEARN, JW .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1964, 172 (03) :369-&
[8]   Effect of sensorial stimulations on postural disturbances related to spatial cognition disorders after stroke [J].
Bonan, I. ;
Chochina, L. ;
Moulinet-Raillon, A. ;
Leblong, E. ;
Jamal, K. ;
Challois-Leplaideur, S. .
NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (4-5) :297-303
[9]  
Campbell W. W., 2005, DEJONGS NEUROLOGICAL
[10]   VISUOSPATIAL NEGLECT - QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES AND LATERALITY OF CEREBRAL LESION [J].
HALLIGAN, PW ;
BURN, JP ;
MARSHALL, JC ;
WADE, DT .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 55 (11) :1060-1068